The advertising above is just a source of revenue, and sometimes, I don't know what will appear there.
Unique grips and accessories for your 1911!
Relocating to Boise? Use my realtor, neighbor, and friend, Cindy Smith csmith@1realtyone.com.
Magazines for cheap!
PayPal members: to make a contribution
Email me at blogmail at claytoncramer dot com. Sorry to be so indirect, but all spambots must die! But they haven't died yet! Include the word spamIamnot in your subject line to make sure that my spam blocker lets you through.
Labels: global warming Labels: homosexuality, STDs Labels: homosexuality, STDs
Never forget!
I ran for Idaho state senate in 2008--didn't win
I've written a number of history books, as well as scholarly and popular articles, (see my web page).
Sorry, high pressure isn't included.
My nephew Shippy makes very pretty ceramic items. Click here to visit his online studio. Give someone one of these, and you can be sure that they don't already have one!
Click here to find out why the Amazon.com Honor System paybox is no longer here.
RSS feed
Other blogs you may enjoy:
My civilian gun defense use blog
My daughter's blog
Pete Drum's Web Page
Gun Laws Don't Work
instapundit.com
Dissecting Leftism -- By John Ray
A courageous Briton arguing for relaxing Britain's gun control laws
Right Thoughts
Final Protective Fire
Amitai Etzioni's Blog
Scrappleface -- Dangerously Clever Satire
Michael Williams -- Master of None
Another Conservative Blogger
A Group Blog By Iraqis
THE MESOPOTAMIAN: TO BRING ONE MORE IRAQI VOICE OF THE SILENT MAJORITY TO THE ATTENTION OF THE WORLD
Specializing in discussions of discrimination and affirmative action
An Iraqi dentist
Promoting children being raised by their own parents
A federal law clerk opines about the law
Michelle Malkin's blog
Impearls: a blog as electic and interesting as mine
Proving that the United States military does more than kill people and break things.
May not agree with this group on everything, but stopping the ACLU is high on my list
A conservative/moderate black blogger.
Another sensible American
Sex, Crime, and Corruption in the Democratic Party
Music, Politics, Motorcycles
Maggie's Farm: Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
A blog dedicated to "Documenting Saddam Hussein's support of Terrorism"
The blog of one of my fellow bloggers on the Civilian Gun Self-Defense Blog
J. Norman Heath's Blog--a circus rigger and Second Amendment scholar (really!)
Buckeye Firearms Association, for you Ohio gun owners and activists
Click here for a FREE NEWSLETTER on Ohio Gun Rights from Buckeye Firearms Association!
Another conservative.
Neocon Blues
Conservative Oasis
Other Idaho Bloggers
Bubbleheads is a retired submariner
An Idaho State University student. A Democrat. Someday, she'll start paying income taxes and change.
A retired Las Vegas stagehand, of all things.
archives
Search only this site: Click here and enter your search string at the beginning of the search field.
Defend Yourself: Go to Jail
This is another incident from New York State, in which a man engaged in what was apparently a lawful defensive use of a gun--and is in jail, because the gun wasn't registered.
Every time the gun controllers say that they want licensing of guns to keep them away from criminals, I find myself looking at cases like this, and saying, "So why is the guy who engaged in a lawful defensive use in jail?"
That Rolling Stone Article
Yes, I aware that some of those quoted in the article are now saying that they were misquoted, or the quote is just false. This raises an interesting question. Which of the following is more likely?
1. That people who make their living in the AIDS treatment industry, whose careers might well be impaired if not ended if enough pressure were applied, and are in daily contact with people with AIDS, have been pressured into claiming that they were misquoted?
2. That a reporter who works for Rolling Stone, a magazine published by an openly gay man, decided to make up quotes for an article that would be profoundly useful for those who are hostile to homosexuality? Perhaps the reporter wanted to get himself fired?
You tell me which you think is the more likely possibility.
Yes, Andrew Sullivan has ripped the reporter a new orifice over this article, but you may recall that Sullivan (who is HIV+) came in for some criticism for his time spent searching for sexual partners willing to skip the appropriate pieces of latex. (And there are more discussions of this here, and here. Search for "Andrew Sullivan" barebacking, and you will have more sites to visit than you can shake a stick at.) Can anyone imagine a reason why Sullivan might have an interest in distracting attention away from a very, very dangerous activity: unsafe sex by HIV+?
A Google search for barebacking returned the insignificant number of about 23,600 sites; searching with dejanews found 3,090 references in news group, almost all before the Rolling Stone article came out (and a very few, apparently involving horses in the original, non-disgusting use of the term). Hey, maybe it is all or mostly fantasy. Right now, I see no reason to disbelieve the Rolling Stone article. It's not like the magazine is exactly pandering to Focus on the Family members.
More Evidence of Global Warming!
Right here.
Yes, yes, I know, extremes of weather can also be an indicator of global warming--but considering how newspapers use record highs to prove the environmentalist/socialist agenda, I guess it's equally fair to use records lows to prove the opposite.
There's Hope for Berkeley Yet!
See this description of what happened when a student signed up for a class titled "Political Science 137B: Marxism and Fascism in the Far East." I am amazed that this professor hasn't been publicly tarred and feathered by the students--or even the rest of the faculty. (Thanks to instapundit.com for the pointer.)
That Rolling Stone Article About "Bug Chasers"
It's finally out, and it's powerful, and frightening. I'm giving you some excerpts here, but I strongly encourage you to go and read the whole article. It is shocking, and I hope that it makes people wake and realize that there is something desperately, desperately wrong that a whole subculture has formed seeking to become infected with a disease that turns life into a living hell:Carlos nonchalantly asks whether his drink was made with whole or skim milk. He takes a moment to slurp on his grande Caffe Mocha in a crowded Starbucks, and then he gets back to explaining how much he wants HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. His eyes light up as he says that the actual moment of transmission, the instant he gets HIV, will be "the most erotic thing I can imagine." He seems like a typical thirty-two-year-old man, but, in fact, he has a secret life. Carlos is chasing the bug.
The article quotes a young man named Hitzel who went through a stage where he actively sought to become infected, but now realizes it was a terrible, terrible mistake:
"I know what the risks are, and I know that putting myself in this situation is like putting a gun to my head," he says. Some of that mountain music that's so popular is playing, making the moment even more surreal as a Southern voice sings, "Keep on the sunny side of life" behind Carlos. "But I think it turns the other guy on to know that I'm negative and that they're bringing me into the brotherhood. That gets me off, too."
...
For some, the chase is a pragmatic move. They see HIV infection as inevitable because of their unsafe sex or needle sharing, so they decide to take control of the situation and infect themselves. It's empowering. They're no longer victims waiting to be infected; rather they are in charge of their own fates. For others, deliberately infecting themselves is the ultimate taboo, the most extreme sex act left on the planet, and that has a strong erotic appeal for some men who have tried everything else. Still others feel lost and without any community to embrace them, and they see those living with HIV as a cohesive group that welcomes its new members and receives vast support from the rest of the gay community, and from society as a whole. Bug chasers want to be a part of that club. Some want HIV because they think once they have it they can go on with a wild, uninhibited sex life without constant fears of the virus. Getting the bug opens the door to sexual nirvana, they say. Others can't stand the thought of being so unlike their HIV-positive lover.
For Carlos, bug chasing is mostly about the excitement of doing something that everyone else sees as crazy and wrong. Keeping this part of his life secret is part of the turn-on for Carlos, which is not his real name. That forbidden aspect makes HIV infection incredibly exciting for him, so much so that he now seeks out sex exclusively with HIV-positive men. "This is something that no one knows about me," Carlos says. "It's mine. It's my dirty little secret." He compares bug chasing to the thrill that you get by screwing your boyfriend in your parents' house, or having sex on your boss' desk. You're not supposed to do it, and that's exactly what makes it so much fun, he says, laughing.Hitzel's experience started when he moved from his home in Nebraska to San Francisco with his boyfriend. When that relationship broke up, Hitzel was at the lowest point in his life, and alone. He sought relief in drugs and sex, as much of each as he could get. At first, he started out just not caring whether he got HIV or not, then he found the bug-chasing underground and embraced it. He was sure he'd get HIV soon anyway. He thought he would always feel exactly like he did then; he was certain that ten, twenty, thirty years later he'd still be partying every night. It lasted only six months -- then Hitzel got sick with awful flulike symptoms and lost a lot of weight. A doctor's visit cleared him of hepatitis and other possible problems, but the clinic sent him home with an HIV test he could do himself. Hitzel waited before doing the test and decided to go home to Nebraska, to give up the bug chasing and the rest of the life that was killing him. Once he got home, he did the test and found out he was positive. He now wakes up each day with a terrible frustration that's just below the surface of his once sunny demeanor. He hates the medication he has to take every day, and he realizes that HIV affects nearly every part of his life. While he was bug chasing, Hitzel couldn't imagine ever wanting to be in a relationship again. But now that he's getting his life back in order, he realizes that being HIV-positive can be a roadblock to new relationships.
This is somewhat equivalent to someone who starts smoking today--with two differences:
"Whenever I have to deal with things like medication, days when I'm really down," Hitzel says, "I have to look myself in the mirror and say, 'You did this. Are you happy now?' That's the one line that goes through my head: 'Are you happy now?' " He says it with a snarl, full of anger. "Some days I feel really angry and guilty. I'm pretty much adjusted to the fact that this is my life, but about forty percent of the time I look at myself and say, 'Look what you've done. Happy now?' "
Looking back on it, Hitzel says he was committing suicide by chasing HIV, killing himself slowly because he didn't have the nerve to do it quickly. Hitzel is ashamed and embarrassed that he actually sought HIV, but he's willing to tell his story because he hopes to dissuade others who are on the same path. He gets angry when he hears bug chasers talking in the same ways he talked a year earlier. The mention of "bug chasing" and "gift giving" sets him off.
" 'Bug chasing' sounds like a group of kindergartners running around chasing grasshoppers and butterflies," Hitzel says, "a beautiful thing. And gift giving? What the hell is that? I just wish the terms would actually put some real context into what's going on. Why did I not want to say that I was deliberately infecting myself? Because saying the word infect sounds bad and gross and germy. I wanted it to be sexualized." He's particularly angered by the idea of HIV being erotic: "How about you follow me after I start new medications and you watch me throw up for a few weeks? Tell me how erotic that is."
Though he's older, Carlos lives a life that has a lot in common with Hitzel's in San Francisco. Carlos estimates that he has had several hundred sex partners throughout his life, and he routinely hooks up with three or four guys a week, all of them HIV-positive or at least uncertain about their status.
That's a common trait among bug chasers, says Dr. Bob Cabaj, director of behavioral-health services for San Francisco County and past president of both the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association and the Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists. Cabaj (pronounced suh-bye) calls bug chasing "a real phenomenon." Some bug chasers are more likely to have a defeatist attitude, to think they'll eventually get HIV anyway, whereas others are more likely to add the element of eroticizing HIV, Cabaj says: "For kids who have had a really hard time fitting in or being accepted, this becomes like a fraternity."
As a public official, Cabaj is familiar with how the topic makes people uncomfortable. Most AIDS activists prefer to deny that the problem exists to any significant extent, he says: "They don't want to address that this is a real ongoing issue."
When I asked about bug chasing, leaders of groups such as Gay Men's Health Crisis in New York, the San Francisco AIDS Foundation, the Stop AIDS Project, and the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation weren't interested in providing much education or increasing public awareness. To the contrary, most were dismissive of the issue and some actively dissuaded me from writing the article at all. A spokeswoman for the Stop AIDS Project, Shana Krochmal, characterized bug chasing as "relatively minor acting-out" and aggressively encouraged me to drop the article idea altogether, saying the issue is "not big enough to warrant a trend story." Krochmal cautioned against focusing on "just a bunch of really vocal guys who want to continue this image of being reckless, hedonistic gay men who will do anything to get laid. I think that does a disservice to the community at large." The San Francisco AIDS Foundation labeled the issue "sensational" and would not provide further comment. GLAAD spokeswoman Cathy Renna was more helpful, saying she had heard enough about bug chasing to be concerned, emphasizing that her group's focus would be whether people use bug chasing as an easy way to disparage all gays and lesbians as sex-crazed and reckless. "The vast majority of the gay community would be just as surprised and appalled by this as anyone else," she says.
At GMHC, where Carlos is one of more than 7,000 volunteers, spokesman Marty Algaze calls bug chasing "one of those very underground subcultures or fetishes that seems to have sprung up in recent years." The assistant director of community education at GMHC, Daniel Castellanos, acknowledges that bug chasing exists but claims there's not much need to discuss it because it involves such a small population. But would he try to talk a bug chaser out of trying to get HIV? "If someone comes to me and says he wants to get HIV, I might work with him around why he wants to do it," he says. "But if in the end that's a decision he wants to make, there's a point where we have to respect people's decisions."
Cabaj, the San Francisco psychiatrist, says those arguments sound familiar. Then, without being asked, he adds, "But I don't know if it's an active cover-up." He pauses for a moment, then continues, "Yeah, it's an active cover-up, because they know about it. They're in denial of this issue. This is a difficult issue that dredges up some images about gay men that they don't want to have to deal with. They don't want to shine a light on this topic because they don't want people to even know that this behavior exists."
Public-health officials also tend to dismiss the bug-chasing phenomenon, he adds, assuming that it is just an aberration practiced by a few, nothing more than a curiosity. Cabaj adamantly disagrees, though he admits numbers are very hard to come by. Some men consciously seek the virus, openly declaring themselves bug chasers, he says, while many more are just as actively seeking HIV but are in denial and wouldn't call themselves bug chasers. Cabaj estimates that at least twenty-five percent of all newly infected gay men fall into that category.
...
One standout in public-health circles is the Miami-Dade County Health Department in Florida, which is taking steps specifically to address bug chasing. Evelyn Ullah, director of its office of HIV/AIDS, readily admits that bug chasing is "a definite problem" in the Miami area, having become more common and more visible in the past few years. Miami health officials regularly monitor Internet sites for bug chasing in their community, and they keep track of "conversion parties," in which the goal is to have positive men infect negative men. The health department also is launching new outreach efforts that include going online to chat with bug chasers and others pursuing risky sex.
...
What frustrates health-care professionals the most, Forstein says, is that "gay men who are doing this haven't a clue what they're doing," he says. "They're incredibly selfish and self-absorbed. They don't have any idea what's going on with the epidemic in terms of the world or society or what impact their actions might have. The sense of being my brother's keeper is never discussed in the gay community because we've gone to the extreme of saying gay men with HIV can do no wrong. They're poor victims, and we can't ever criticize them."
Furthering the epidemic doesn't bother Carlos. Bug chasing requires a great deal of self-delusion, and he easily acknowledges the contradictions in what he's doing. He notes that while he seeks HIV, he doesn't eat junk food or smoke, and that he drinks only socially. "I take care of myself," he says proudly. He also notes the hypocrisy in his doing volunteer work at GMHC, in which he tells other men to use condoms and practice safe sex, while he's hunting for partners for his secret hobby. The conflict doesn't bother him in the least.
Forstein says that attitude is disastrous for gay men. "We're killing each other," he says. "It's no longer just the Matthew Shepards that are dying at the hands of others. We're killing each other. We have to take responsibility for this as a community."
After several phone calls to work out a time, Carlos is ready to go see Richard. He's had sex with Richard about thirty times in the past year. "Knowing he's positive just makes it more fun for me," he says. "It's erotic that someone is breeding me." Richard is in the entertainment business, in his mid- to late forties.
1. Not every smoker will end up desperately sick. Every HIV+ will end up very ill, and stay that way for years.
2. Most smokers with cancer, lung-related ailments, or heart disease, while they cause enormous expense to their private insurance company, are not a major expense to the taxpayers. These young men who are choosing to become infected will overwhelmingly be an expense to the taxpayers.
Second Annoying Reminder & Ad
I will be keynote speaker at CounterAttack, a grassroots gun rights activist conference in Dallas February 8-9. If you haven't already made reservations, it's not too late! I will also be leading a workshop on issues of race, gun control, and how activists can deal with these issues.
You think you know everything there is know about the Bellesiles scandal? My keynote address will be a history of the scandal--not all the details of where Arming America is fraudulent, but the whole, somewhat amazing story of how the fraud was discovered and exposed. Besides, you get to meet me as something other than a disembodied collection of electrons.
The difficulties that the travel industry are having at the moment means that there are some real bargains on airfare and hotel acommodations still available for this event.
My friend Jim March, who played a major part in sending the Millionth Mom March into financial disaster by requiring San Francisco government to stop subsidizing it, will also be there to speak.
Jerry Springer Mulls Run For U.S. Senate
And you thought things were vulgar and disgusting with Bill "Frat Boy" Clinton in the Oval Office! Imagine Jerry Springer on the floor of the Senate. This is a guy with absolutely no notion of appropriate limits on what to put on television--as long as pandering to the masses makes him money. I'm imaging Springer on the Judiciary Committee interviewing a candidate for the federal bench. "So, Judge Johnson, have you ever slept with your mother? Your sister? Livestock? Do you mind if we bring some of them into the hearing to tell us their side of this?" See the story here.
If Pigs Had Wings...
The Salt Lake Tribune carries a story from the Los Angeles Times (of course) about the claim that making concealed weapon permits more available increases crime. Stanford law professor John Donohue is quoted:
In short, he doesn't sound like he knows with any certainty whether these law reduce or increase crime, or maybe do nothing at all. It gets better:
"If somebody had to say which way the evidence is stronger, I'd say that it's probably stronger that the laws are increasing crime, rather than decreasing crime," Donohue said Wednesday. "But the stronger thing I could say is that I don't see any strong evidence that they are reducing crime." Donohue said right-to-carry laws may deter violent crimes, such as murder or robbery, in some situations, while encouraging them in others. For example, he said, an attacker may wrest control of a handgun away from his victim.
Does he have even a single example of such an incident involving a concealed weapon permit holder being disarmed by an attacker? Police officers are frequently disarmed by people that they are arresting, because they have to get very close to pat them down and put on the handcuffs. Civilians are in an entirely different situation. I have never read of a concealed weapon permit holder being disarmed by an attacker. Perhaps it has happened somewhere--and perhaps, somewhere, there are flying pigs--but not enough to make me wear protective headgear against pig droppings!
Also, otherwise law-abiding citizens may become "emboldened to do bad things, some of them violent" in the heat of the moment, Donohue said.
I am aware of three concealed weapon permit holders that have committed murder with a gun, and only two were in states that had made this change to the law--and we are talking about a period approaching 15 years in Florida, and more than 10 years in most of the other states. One was in Florida, where the killer was about to lose his carry permit--because the state law was changing, so that prior sealed felony convictions would no longer be sealed. He invited his ex-wife to meet him at a restaurant, where he killed her, and committed suicide. It is hard to believe that without a carry permit, that this guy would not have committed this crime.
UPDATE: For those who have read the Violence Policy Center's License to Kill IV: More Guns, More Crime: it is very interesting to read newspaper accounts of some of their examples of carry permit holders committing crimes. Shall we say that the stories get more interesting, and more ambiguous. For example, their version is:On October 21, 2000, cab driver and concealed handgun license holder Wayne Franklin Lambert, Jr. was driving home two passengers, Lance Hughes and Kevin MacDonald. During the drive, Lambert pulled over and at some point shot both passengers with his stainless steel Para-Ordance 45 caliber pistol. Hughes, shot three times in the back, died at the scene, while MacDonald died in surgery hours later. According to the Austin American-Statesman, Lambert told one passerby at the scene that the two men had tried to rob him, he then told two other passersby that the two men had tried to jump him, and he told a cab driver who later appeared at the scene that the two men had tried to flee his cab without paying the fare. At a press conference six weeks after his arrest, Lambert told reporters that he shot the “rich kids” in self-defense, that they were drunk, possibly drugged, attackers. According to the Austin American-Statesman, before he went into surgery, MacDonald stated that although Lambert and Hughes had argued, Hughes didn’t try and hit Lambert. MacDonald claimed that Lambert was offended by something they had said, challenged them to a fight, and threatened to call the police to accuse the two passengers of trying to rob him. On April 9, 2001, Lambert died in jail while awaiting trial.
But when you read newspaper accounts, you get a much murkier version, including this newspaper report that, Taxi driver Wayne Franklin Lambert Jr., 53, who had a gash over his left eye that required 18 stitches, told police he acted in self-defense. But he also gave differing accounts to witnesses as they happened upon the scene: They tried to rob him; they tried to run out on his fare; they jumped him.
Somehow, a gash requiring 18 stitches, while not enough to prove Lambert's version of the story, doesn't quite fit with MacDonald's claim that "Hughes didn't try and hit Lambert." There were a lot of inconsistencies in Lambert's story, and he changed that story several times, which is doubtless while he was charged. (It didn't help any that one of the dead men was shot in the back three times.) Was Lambert a victim who defended himself, or a hot-headed drunk (he was drunk at the time) who lost his temper and murdered two people? I don't know. I can see, from the news accounts, some evidence on both sides of this, which will never be resolved, because Lambert died before going to trial.
Ann Coulter Manages To Write a Column That Is Accurate, Funny, and Not Particularly Nasty...
I knew that she could do it! There are some wonderful lines in it, in which she points out that the Supreme Court is supposed to be deciding the constitutionality of a law, (This isn't a permalink yet) not whether it makes everyone happy or not:Even the wackiest Supreme Court rulings always make a big show of pretending to consult the Constitution before announcing, for example, that Christmas displays must have a particular ratio of reindeer to virgins. I don't know whom the Supreme Court thought it was fooling, but Americans were not fooled. The Growing Constitution has grown into a collection of primal urges, devoid of law. People believe their wild irrational appetites should find expression in Supreme Court opinions.
Gun Licensing Is Only To Catch Criminals...
See this article from the New York Daily News, then, about a prosecution of a recent arrival in New York City who shot a career criminal who had broken into his home:Ronald Dixon froze in fear when he saw an intruder enter his toddler son's bedroom, and his heart pounded wildly after he fired two shots in a confrontation with the stranger. Later, upset that he might have taken a life, Dixon shook as the wounded man lay in his driveway.
And so why is the District Attorney prosecuting Dixon for shooting a guy who forced entry and had a 14 page rap sheet?
The encounter was only the beginning of an emotional upheaval for the soft-spoken Brooklyn computer engineer.
A month later, Dixon's feelings still swing from relief when he smiles at his son, to terror about what could have happened, to dread about possibly serving time because he used an unlicensed gun.
"The only thing I could think about was my family - there was no telling what he would do to my children or girlfriend," Dixon said in an interview last week.
"If I have to go to jail on the weekends, I couldn't work," he added, his voice cracking. "I couldn't pay my mortgage."
On Dec. 14, Dixon shot a career burglar who allegedly broke into his Canarsie house. Dixon used a 9-mm. pistol legally purchased in Florida that he says he was in the process of registering here.District Attorney Charles Hynes is in the difficult position of prosecuting a hardworking, law-abiding Navy veteran for defending his family and home.
Make no mistake about it: gun licensing isn't to catch the criminals. It's to catch their victims.
But there were 486 shootings in Brooklyn last year, and the borough remains awash in illegal firearms. A spokesman said Hynes cannot condone the use of an unlicensed gun.
Thanks to Rachel Lucas for the pointer.
Why Planting a Bomb in The Capitol Isn't Terrorism
More evidence that competence with English and logic are no longer required to be a professor:Laura Whitehorn never thought her invitation to speak at an African and African American Studies graduate seminar would attract a second glance.
It's nice to know that Ms. Whitehorn is such a master of the bomb making arts that she knows when the bomb is going to go off, and such a master of mind reading that she knows when the janitors will have all left the building. Let's see, planting a bomb in a public building, where people go to visit, is the "opposite of terrorism." And I love how she defines planting a bomb in a building as "encourag[ing] the government...." I guess armed robbery qualifies as "encouraging charity" as well.
The problem, the Duke Conservative Union charges, is that Whitehorn is a convicted terrorist.
Whitehorn spent 1985 to 1999 in prison for planting a bomb in the U.S. Capitol in protest of the U.S. invasion of Grenada.
Becky Thompson, a visiting professor in AAAS, thought Whitehorn's past political experience--from women's liberation to civil rights to HIV/AIDS awareness in prison--made her a perfect addition to a six-part lecture series in her class, "Teaching Race, Teaching Gender."
....
Whitehorn, 60, expressed shock at the negative press. Active on the campus lecture circuit--delivering several annual speeches at institutions such as Vassar, Cornell, Columbia, Brown and the Church of St. John the Divine in New York City--she said this is the first time her speaking has garnered any negative publicity. An electronic search of campus publications found no mention of her.
"I was a pacifist for much of my life, and I am very against terrorism," she said. "Terrorism is the targeting of civilians, a reactionary form of arms struggle. I've never been involved in targeting civilians. [The U.S. Capitol bombing] was a symbolic action. Great care that no one would be hurt was taken, even the janitorial staff."
While she does not encourage anyone else to copy what she did at the U.S. Capitol, she said she is not ashamed of her motives.
Thompson said she was equally surprised by the DCU's reaction to Whitehorn speaking on campus. "Her work was actually the opposite of terrorism," she said, adding that it was protesting other acts of perceived terrorism. "Part of being patriotic is trying to encourage the government to stand by principles of equality and democracy."
The debate is a free speech issue and the definition of patriotism does not exclude dissent, she said.
McDonald's Obesity Suit Dismissed
From Associated Press:NEW YORK –– A federal judge on Wednesday dismissed a class action lawsuit filed on behalf of New York children that claimed McDonald's food caused them to suffer health problems including diabetes, high blood pressure and obesity.
This is the sort of lawsuit that deserves sanctions against the attorney who brought it for filing a frivolous lawsuit. This is also why, as much as I agree in theory that trial lawyers do a lot of good, they do so much bad that I will almost always be on the opposite side from them in any dispute. This is the sort of dishonest, manipulative, greedy behavior that leads to the sign one business here in Boise has up. It says, "99% of lawyers ruin the reputation of the rest."
"If consumers know (or reasonably should know) the potential ill health effects of eating at McDonald's, they cannot blame McDonald's if they, nonetheless, choose to satiate their appetite with a surfeit of supersized McDonald's products," U.S. District Court Judge Robert Sweet said in a 65-page ruling.
"One necessary element of any potentially viable claim must be that McDonald's products involve a danger that is not within the common knowledge of consumers. ... Plaintiffs have failed to allege with any specificity that such a danger exists."
No Comment Necessary
From Drudge Report:XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX TUE JAN 21, 2003 17:59:25 ET XXXXX
MAG: 25% OF NEW HIV CASES IN USA ARE MEN WHO SOUGHT OUT VIRUS
New ROLLING STONE Managing Editor Ed Needham is set to hit complete controversy with a 4-page report: "Bug Chasers: The Men Who Secretly Long To Be HIV+."
Filed by Greg Freeman, the shock story claims some men with HIV are deliberately having unprotected sex with those who want to be infected!
MORE
"The men who want the virus are called 'bug chasers,' and the men who freely give them the virus are called 'gift givers.' While the rest of the world fights the AIDS epidemic and most people fear HIV infection, this subculture celebrates the virus and eroticizes it," reports Freeman in the February 6, 2003 edition of ROLLING STONE.
At least twenty-five percent of all newly infected gay men fall into [bug-chasing] category, according to one claim in the magazine.
"In this world, the men with HIV are the most desired, and the bug chasers will do anything to get the virus."
Gay groups "aggressively encouraged" Freeman to drop the article.
One sad passage captures a young man in New York City who wants to be infected:
"His eyes light up as he says that the actual moment of transmission, the instant he gets HIV, will be 'the most erotic thing I can imagine.'"
An infector is quoted as saying: "I'm murdering him in a sense, killing him slowly, and that's sort of, as sick as it sounds, exciting to me."
Human Shields & The Gene Pool
This story is about how hundreds, perhaps thousands of committed leftists and pacifists from around the world--though so far, mostly from the West--are headed to Iraq to act as human shields:A first wave of mainly Western volunteers will leave London this weekend on a convoy bound for Iraq to act as "human shields" at key sites and populous areas in case of a U.S.-led war on Baghdad.
I am somewhat amused that Ken Nichols thinks the Iraqis aren't white--otherwise why throw that in?
"The potential for white Western body parts flying around with the Iraqi ones should make them think again about this imperialist oil war," organizer Ken Nichols, a former U.S. marine in the 1991 Gulf War (news - web sites), told Reuters.
If there is anything that the focus on precision munitions has demonstrated, it is that the U.S. is very concerned with reducing the number of Iraqi body parts that have been to thrown around.
If there is a genetic predisposition to gullibility, or to defending a government that regularly tortures people to death, cuts out tongues, gouges out eyes, drills through hands, and issues identity cards that list a government employee's job title as, "violator of women's honor," this should make some progress towards removing this from the gene pool.
Better Yields With Bonds
I just bought some Capital One bonds due in July of 2004, with an annualized yield of 5.24%. For those of you who are not thrilled with the lousy returns from your money market funds, consider buying investment grade bonds with fairly short maturities. You will have to go to the lower reaches of the investment grade ratings, but even Moody's Baa3 rated bonds have pretty respectable one year default rates (2.5% for the period 1983-99)--and even defaulted bonds, on average, eventually return most of their face value. Still, you don't want to invest too much in any single bond, especially at the low end of the investment grade ratings.
One advantage of these short-term bonds is that when interest rates start to run up again, these short-term bonds don't lose much capital value, because you can always just hold them to maturity. I have some confidence that after Gulf War II completes, Iraq will again be a major exporter of oil, and the new government, call it puppet if you want--will probably be quite interested in both selling a lot of oil to pay for repair to their Hussein-ruined country, and to help out the U.S. by driving the price of oil down a bit, thus driving up our economy.
Why Did Scott Ritter Become a Defender of Saddam Hussein?
This news story certainly makes me wonder if Hussein has some embarrassing pictures that might explain the dramatic change in the last few years:Colonie -- The Internet sex case that led to the arrest of a former U.N. weapons inspector was not his first involvement with police on that type of crime, a person familiar with the case said Monday.
Hmmm. Depraved, and a slow learner, too. You would have thought the first arrest would have caused him to wonder if this strategy for finding little girls was wise.
Scott Ritter was under investigation for trying to set up a meeting with a girl through the Internet when town police charged him in June 2001 with using an online chat room to set up a similar rendezvous at a Menands restaurant, the source said on condition of anonymity.
Police began investigating the 41-year-old Ritter, who lives in Delmar, in April 2001 after he tried to meet someone he thought was a 14-year-old girl, the source said. Ritter drove to a Colonie business, where he instead was met by police officers, the source said.
Ritter, an outspoken critic of President Bush's plans for war against Iraq, was released without being charged while police investigated.
Two months later, the source said, Ritter was caught in the same type of Internet sex-sting operation after he tried to lure a 16-year-old girl to a Burger King in Menands. The supposed teenager actually was an undercover investigator posing online as a minor as part of the town Police Department's investigation of Internet sex crime, the source said.
A Little Late To Be Reporting This As News...
But quite an interesting page about a memorial for 9/11 in Sandy, Utah. Lots of pictures.
The Lott (John Lott) Controversy Has Been Resolved
The 1997 survey on defensive gun use that some people have been saying was a fraud, and never took place? The matter has been resolved. Someone (an attorney) came forward who was surveyed in the right period of time, with the right sort of questions. Professor James Lindgren, who had clearly become very skeptical of Dr. Lott's claims that the survey did happen, and a hard disk crash destroyed all his data, has interviewed the attorney who was surveyed, and Professor Lindgren finds him credible. Best of all, even Tim Lambert, a gun control advocate who has been Dr. Lott's chief inquisitor on this matter, seems to have accepted the validity of this evidence.
I've seen the email on this from the attorney in question--a former assistant district attorney who was fired for defending himself from a criminal attack using a gun. (No charges were filed; his employer, I guess, figured it was better for him to be dead than alive.) I am very happy to hear that this is resolved; Dr. Lott and I have been talking almost nightly about this matter for the last week, and I doubt that it has been good for his blood pressure.
Senator Daschle's Skeletons in the Closet
It's always useful to see corporate welfare promoters embarrassed by the left, such as this article about Senator Daschle from LA Weekly, explaining why he chose not to run for President:Right after then-Congressman Tom Daschle dumped his first wife for a younger, prettier one, the former Miss Kansas Linda Daschle went to work as chief lobbyist for the Air Transport Association, the airline industry’s main lobby; she then became the senior vice president of the American Association of Airport Executives; and these days hangs her hat at the pricey top Washington law/lobby shop Baker, Donelson, Bearman & Caldwell, headed by former GOP Senate leader and ex–Reagan chief of staff Howard Baker — where she peddles influence on behalf of a long list of lucrative aviation clients. The clients for whom Linda lobbied brought more than $5.86 million into Baker, Donelson in one three-year period, including Northwest Airlines ($870,000 from 1997 through 2001) and American Airlines ($1.26 million in fees). Northwest was already teetering on the edge of bankruptcy even before 9/11. American, which has had six fatal crashes since 1994 (not counting 9/11) and has been repeatedly fined by the FAA for a skein of safety violations, had the reputation as the most unsafe major U.S. carrier.
Now, 9/11 was a pretty good argument for bailing out the airlines, but yes, the airlines were already in trouble before that point--and this sort of sleazy relationship is one of the reasons that government regulation, even when necessary, has such dangerous consequences. You know the famous saying by Thomas Sowell:When legislatures control buying and selling, the first thing to be bought sold will be legislators.
A Better Caliber of Conman
If you are like me, you probably receive several dozen " 419" con emails a week, from people claiming to be the son or widow of some recently deceased African strongman with lots of money that needs a foreign participant to help move out of Nigeria, the Congo, or South Africa. Sometimes, the conman claims to be the director of some government agency with illegally obtained funds, and he wants your help. You just need to provide some good faith money, and in exchange, you will receive millions of dollars. That such emails are sent to you, picked at random, isn't supposed to make you suspicious.
Anyone that would get taken in by the vast majority of these scams is a person whose greed is only exceeded by their stupidity. But today, a friend forwarded to me a new, and considerably better caliber of con. I still can't imagine anyone with the intelligence of a rutabaga being taken in by this, but it it isn't quite as blatantly a scam as the usual ones:From: Chief Onyema Ugochukwu CFR, NIPSS.
And if you find this letter persuasive or intriguing--just go throw some money in the tip jar to the left--it will be about as likely to make you rich.
Chairman, Niger Delta Development Commission,
Nigeria.
I am Chief Onyema Ugochukwu, Chairman of the newly created Niger Delta
Development Commission (NDDC).This commission is created to take charge of
infrastructures and developmental projects throughout the long neglected oil
rich Niger Delta Region in Nigeria.
The present democratic government in Nigeria has earmarked vast resources
for the re-design, development and execution of extensive projects, starting
from the year 2001.
Presently, over 867 projects are pencilled for immediate execution in the
186 local councils of the Niger Delta region in South-South Nigeria, before
the expiration of the second term of this administration in the year 2007.
This ranges from consultancy to design, construction, dredging, landscaping,
civic design, telecommunications community development, medical research,
general contracts and supplies.
The scope of this commission's mandate is no way limited. As chairman of the
Contracts/Projects Advisory and Award Committee, Contracts/Consultancy jobs
of various categories will be authorized and awarded by my office.
A substantial part of Contracts/Projects to be awarded by my Commission is
set aside for foreign Contractors/Consultants. This is in line with the
Present Democratic Government's policy of encouraging foreign
partnership/Investments in Nigeria.
I am contacting you/your reputable company/organisation to participate as I
need reliable foreign partners, capable and willing to work closely with me
for the duration of my tenure in office. Such partners, as I seek would be
beneficiaries to Contracts/Consultancy Projects awarded under my
supervision.
The distance between Nigeria and your operational base/office must not be
considered a disadvantage as it is not mandatory for you to be physically be
on ground in Nigeria, considering the ease with which relevant data can be
exchanged via the internet, fax and courier.
Please note that it does not matter what your line of expertise is. I
repeat, your present engagement, work or business does not adversely affect
you from participation as I believe that my Commision's scope is wide enough
to contain diverse inputs.
If you are serious minded and appreciate the immense opportunity in this
proposal put before you and sincerely believe that the Niger Delta region
could benefit from your wealth and resource of knowledge, then I await your
prompt response.
Kindly reply to this invitation via this medium. Thank you, as I look
forward to welcoming you on board.
My best personal regards,
Chief O. Ugochukwu.
Reasons To Not Have a Discover Card
Back in December, my wife's purse disappeared. We thought it had been stolen, so we frantically started calling credit card companies to shut down accounts. One of those accounts was our Discover Card. A few days later, my wife's purse showed up at a friend's house.
Then, in January, our Discover Card statement arrived--with a $35 late fee, a bit of interest charges, and an upset "your account is past due" nasty note. What? So I dug around--and I couldn't find any evidence that we had paid the bill in December. It soon became apparent that we did not receive a bill in December. Okay, the post office might have lost our bill, or perhaps someone stole it from our mailbox. (We've had outgoing mail stolen before.)
I called up Discover Card this morning and asked for a copy of the December statement--and they informed me that the reason that I didn't receive my December statement is that they didn't send it to me. When an account is closed, they are unable to print statements--even a closing statement. She was able to read off the charges (one of which, for $25 from eBay, is suspicious), but she could not print the December statement.
After I whined about this for a while, she agreed to drop the late fee of $35 (though not the interest charges), since they hadn't sent me a bill. The more I think about this, the more angry I get. What sort of a system would not automatically send a closing statement when the account is closed--and wouldn't even allow you to print a copy for a customer? It isn't that the information isn't available, because the service representative could see the December statement, and read it to me.
I am seriously considering closing my Discover Card accounts, and going back to using MasterCard only.
