The advertising above is just a source of revenue. If the ads get offensive enough, I may drop them.

Clayton Cramer's BLOG

Clayton's commentary on news and events of the day. Broadly speaking, I'm a conservative with libertarian sympathies (getting more conservative as my children get older).



Email me at blogmail at claytoncramer dot com. Sorry to be so indirect, but all spambots must die! But they haven't died yet! Include the word spamIamnot in your subject line to make sure that my spam blocker lets you through.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Friday, September 09, 2005
 
Encouraging Retaliation

I am just horrified. People that sign a petition related to gay marriage are about to be publicly "outed" -- with their names and addresses published on the Web, so that every ignorant yahoo out there can threaten them for exercising their right to petition the government. But no, this isn't a bunch of right-wingers trying to intimidate supporters of gay marriage:
A pair of gay activists are raising the stakes in the fight over same-sex marriage, vowing to post on the Internet the name and address of anyone who signs a petition to ban gay marriage and civil unions in Massachusetts.

``I have the fight in me now, and if people I know, or that I support, or that I do business with are on that list, I might not support them or their philanthropies or their businesses,'' said Tom Lang, who launched knowthyneighbor.org with his spouse, Alex Westerhoff.

Lang, 42, said he and Westerhoff, 36, are only providing via the Internet public information that any citizen could obtain at the secretary of state's office. But anti-gay marriage activists are outraged.

``We think that it is intimidation by no other name,'' said Kristian Mineau, whose name was listed as one of the first 30 signers of the petition. Mineau said he will explore the rights of people who have signed or plan to sign the petition.

``Certainly it raises my concerns. This is the first I have heard of it,'' said Mineau, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute.

Mineau and his wife are listed on the site, along with their address. Also listed: former Mayor Raymond L. Flynn; Dover Selectwoman Kathleen W. Weld and her husband, Walter Weld; and Richard W. Richardson, spokesman for the Black Ministerial Alliance.

...

Lang said he was not advocating that gay marriage backers use the Web site as a method of intimidating the signers, but rather as a way to ``open up communication'' on both sides of the debate. ``We are not telling people what to do. We are letting people become their own armchair activists,'' he said.
Oh yeah, and if a pro-life group put up a website listing the names and home addresses of abortion doctors, but claimed, "We want you to open up communication with them," I would believe that, too.


Thursday, September 08, 2005
 
Feeling A Little Better

Sleep is a wonderful restorative. This is good; the order for ScopeRoller products from Spain now has a British order as well that I need to fill.


 
House Project: Electrical, Mechanical, Raptors

We went up Wednesday evening to go through the house with the electrician and tell him where to put light fixture, how many outlets (above and beyond what the code requires), light switches, etc. The electrician is also our neighbor down the hill, which is certainly convenient.

Driving up Sunburst Road, it looks more and more like a house.

Click to enlarge

You can see heating and air conditioning vents beginning to appear.

Click to enlarge

Getting ready for the furnace and water heater.

Click to enlarge

The windows are in! Ansco is the maker; these are a low-E glass, with about 58% transmission, the rest is reflected back out to keep the house from overheating in summer.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Roofers hard at work, apparently without fear of falling.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Here you can see the vent for the kitchen.

Click to enlarge

Yesterday, tubs and showers were in the right rooms, but they weren't permanently placed yet.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Raptor overhead!

Click to enlarge

The builder asked me if we want to spend an extra $1000 to insulate under the floor--apparently not required by code in our county (yet). Since we are going to have tile floors, and it gets cold in winter, I'm sure that it will pay for itself in several years of reduced gas bills.

I went up there today to resolve a question about shower stall placement in bathroom three, and I wish that I had brought my camera. There was a swarm of plumbers and roofers at work, and the LP tank was being dropped into the ground.

One guy was dressed too nicely to be construction, so I asked if he was a building inspector. It turns out that he works for the insulation contractor. I asked him about the building code requirements: R-38 for the roof, and R-19 for the walls. I asked him what it would cost to go to R-50 for the roof--and since it was only about $420 more, I told him to go for it. My guess is that it will pay for itself in reduced heating and air conditioning costs in five years--and she that was about right, in this climate.

The last house project entry.

Labels:



 
The Older I Get...

The more miserable a common cold makes me feel--and how quickly it does its dirty deed. This one took me from feeling okay--yesterday afternoon--to the "must sleep, even though my son is playing drums two rooms away" state--this afternoon. (He didn't know that I had come home sick, and I was too weak to get out of bed to tell him that I was here.)

Maybe once the new house is built, I will become a full-time telecommuter, so that I am not exposed to everyone's germs. Howard Hughes's obssession looks less and less silly all the time. Or does that indicate that I am getting more and more silly with time?


 
Interesting Account of Air National Guard Operations

This was forwarded a couple of times before it got to me, through a co-worker. (I've fixed a few typos and cleaned up the formatting a bit.)
This is an e-mail that a friend of mine who's ex-Air Force (was a C-130
loadmaster for something like 15 years) got recently and forwarded on.

He tells me that the sender is with the Tennessee Air National Guard and he knows him. It's a good look from an insider perspective on the airlift operation that was underway (I guess it still is underway) in NOLA. Name(s) redacted out of privacy.

Subject: Flying into New Orleans yesterday

Hi everyone,

I just returned from New Orleans on a hurricane relief mission in the C-130. Let me just start by saying I was awed. Not in what I saw in destruction and devastation because I had/have already seen enough of that on TV. What really hit me hard was the absolute determination and willingness of all those involved in the relief effort.

I just want to quickly tell you what I was a part of and what I witnessed as it just really filled me with pride and reminded me again why we are such an amazing and successful country.

It started when I showed up for the flight in Nashville. Instead of the flight planning I would normally do (the other pilot did it), I was tasked to call all 60 or so of the pilots from the 105th Airlift
Squadron (my squadron) and find out their availability to fly hurricane relief missions.

Now, don't forget these are all Air National Guard men and women and most all have full time jobs outside of flying for the Guard. Almost without exception, every pilot offered whatever assistance was needed. No surprise.

I then jumped in the airplane and flew directly to New Orleans Int'l, which was and is only open to relief efforts. We had on board with us an aero medical evacuation team. They are a group of highly trained
nurses and med techs that are qualified in evacuating wounded and sick soldiers from the battlefield and keeping them alive enroute to a medical facility.

One of the many missions of the C-130 is basically a flying hospital. We can literally set up and intensive care unit in the back if needed. So, with our team of aero meds and flight crew on board, we set course for New Orleans with the rough idea that we would transport
injured and sick people to Ellington Field, TX (Houston, TX). From there we would fly to Alexandria, LA, Charlotte, and then back to Nashville. Our mission ended up evacuating one of the VA hospitals' patients as
well as several civilians.

The weather was not great once we neared New Orleans. We made it in and were met by an airport SUV that led us to what is normally an airline passenger gate. The difference was the gates housed medical teams (mainly military that had just arrived) and scores of sick refugees (for lack of better term). We squeezed ourselves into a parking spot perpendicular to a C-141 and next to two C-17's. There were other Air Force planes on the ground as well. By the time we finally left, five other C-130's and another C-17 had joined us.

What happened next just really made my heart swell with pride. From every direction and in about 15 to 45 second intervals, helicopter after helicopter continued to land right next to us. It was a mix of Army Blackhawks, Coast Guard helicopters as well as Marine and Army. They were joined by what must have been 15 "Flight for Life" helicopters from hospitals all around the Southeast. I saw Miami, Arkansas, and many other names painted on the sides. This was not normal operations.

These pilots were practically landing and taxiing on top of each other. They came in fully loaded with sick personnel. Many right from the rooftops. One New Orleans Airport fireman took on the duty of aircraft
marshaller and marshaled in choppers left and right. The helos would unload and then take right back off. It was not uncommon for a helicopter to be on the ground less than two to three minutes and then blast back off. We were basically parked in the triage area.

These helicopters were immediately met by ground personnel who helped the people off the helos and if they couldn't walk, they put them on a stretcher or just flat carried them. What makes it so extraordinary is when I realize that these ground personnel were just the airport workers, airline employees, cart drivers, fireman, and then the staff of all the emergency teams. It was amazing. They were not necessarily trained for the jobs they were/are undertaking. They just stepped up to the plate and did it. The tower and ground controllers were coordinating airplanes and helicopters like they had never imagined in their most terrible nightmares and were doing a very good job of it.

There were literally so many helicopters coming in and out of triage area that I do not understand how the tower guy could see through them all to control the planes once they landed. The little baggage trailers
and tugs that you normally see zipping around the airport were being used to move survivors out to the airplanes. They can best be described as miniambulances. The terminals at the airport were triage and staging areas. The airport vehicles that are usually operated by airport managers and security were leading airplanes and helicopters to newly created parking spaces.

Then the huge thunderstorm hit to make matters even worse. Thunder, lightening, and driving rain pounded the airport and surrounding area for over 1.5 hours. The helicopter pilots and crews never stopped. Everyone was so determined and working with such purpose. I literally watched this one helicopter bring people in and then leave again for another load four times in the 1.5 hour long torrential rain storm.
This pace was not uncommon.

Another thing that exemplified the unselfishness of the rescuers was this one old and worn out red and white helicopter. It looked like something that does heavy lifting for construction up on mountains. Basically, it did not look like one that was designed to carry people and conduct search and rescue. From all I can tell, it was just a privately owned helicopter that the two pilots decided they were going to make work for this. I still remember the pilot in the left seat. He
just had on jeans, tennis shoes and some kind of old shirt.

He was a little overweight, but you could just see the determination and purpose on his face as he brought that big helo in run after run after run. Don't misinterpret what I am describing. The military guys
were doing this too, but I did not expect this from some private company or individual. t just was incredible. Absolutely incredible.

There is no way the helos should have been flying in this weather. If this was just some regular mission or training flight, you can bet your kids Super Play Station that they would not have been flying. It would have been easier and probably safer to floss a shark's teeth them to have gotten these guys to stop flying. The same thing went for everyone working to organize and evacuate the sick, hurt, and elderly inside the airport. The process was a little slower than ideal, but it is a massive undertaking not ever encountered by the agencies initially put in charge.

Long story short, Air Force medical teams got in there and got the ball rolling. As we left, a medical evacuation command post was coming online, which will significantly speed up the process of bringing people
into the airport and them putting them on planes to fly out.

Another one of our Nashville C-130's was on the ground with us. They received their patients first. Once they could not physically fit anymore on their plane, they left and we took they next group. Our aero med team and flight crew just started helping the people who could
barely walk onto the plane and assisted in the loading of stretchers. Back to selflessness, we were also joined by two doctors who had been assisting in all the relief efforts at Tulane Hospital. They decided to
go on the flight with us. One was an MD in his 7th year of surgery residency and the other was an MD who worked full time at Tulane hospital. They had been working nonstop since the hurricane.

Another resident MD told me how after the hurricane hit he had to go home and get some sleep. He awoke to rising water at his place, so he got in his kayak and paddled down the street, past looting, which he said was very unnerving, and into Tulane hospital where he has been working ever since. The great American spirit is indeed alive and well.

We ended up taking 20 patients on litters (military for stretcher) and 31 people (not healthy at all) that could sit up for a total of 51 to Ellington Field, TX. We arrived there and were met by what can only be
described as an eye watering reception. We called the field 20 minutes out and let them know we would be landing shortly and passed on our patient information.

Well, let me tell you something. As we taxied in I looked towards our parking spot and I must have counted 30 ambulances and a line of hospital workers/volunteers with wheelchairs at the ready lined up 50 deep. There was another equally long line of paramedics with gurneys. These people had it together. We shut down engines and then watched as Ellington’s smooth operation kicked into gear. The sickest of the sick
were rushed to hospitals. Everyone else was given food, cold drinks, seen by a social worker, doctor, and other specialists. Then, one of the head NASA people there gave me his car to go to Jack in the Box to get food for the crew. Incredible!

By this time we were running out of our 16 hour crew day and we still had two more stops. Unfortunately, we couldn't get to it all as we had to head right back to Nashville, but another crew picked up the mission. I will be doing missions similar to this one tomorrow (Fri) and Saturday. Our Guard Base (TN Air National Guard) is flying six of our eight or nine airplanes out tomorrow in direct support of rescue operations. We plan on doing this for the foreseeable future.

Overall, I cannot do justice to all the good I saw today just by writing. I wanted to try though. Basically, the operation set up down there at the New Orleans Airport is one eerily similar to that of
Baghdad Int'l airport when I was there for over eight months. Just a hive of activity with people pushing their bodies and aircraft to the max. No one complains, they just get the job done and worry about the rest later. Every citizen of this country should be so proud of what their fellow citizens are doing for each other.

The pressure they are working under knowing these sick and stranded people do not have time on their side is unexplainable. Our country is one of great strength and determination. It is evident in all the rescue and relief efforts that are taking place down there. If the hard work and pure grit of all the rescue and medical personnel I witnessed today are of any indication of the eventual outcome of this indescribable tragedy, then we are on the absolute fast track to victory.

I just want to add one more thing. I did not write this all out to highlight myself. In fact it is quite the contrary. I want all of you to know the efforts that are being made from the individual level to the highest level of government. Nothing is being held back. I just
happen to fly an airplane from one field to another and am very happy to do it.

Please say some extra prayers for all of those suffering due to hurricane Katrina and for all of those working to save lives and rebuild city. Talk to ya'll soon and have a great day.


 
Roger Baldwin, the ACLU, & Civil Liberties

I mentioned yesterday that Professor Volokh had blogged an astonishing collection of statements by Roger Baldwin, who founded the ACLU, about the Soviet Union. Professor Volokh has now put up an image of an article by Roger Baldwin in Soviet Russia Today, vol. 3 [Sept. 1934], p. 11. Here's some choice sections from this absolutist defender of civil liberties:
Proletarian Liberty in Practice

When that power of the working class is once achieved, as it has been only in the Soviet Union, I am for maintaining it by any means whatever. Dictatorship is the obvious means in a world of enemies at home and abroad. I dislike it in principle as dangerous to its own objects. But the Soviet Union has already created liberties far greater than exist elsewhere in the world. They are liberties that most closely affect the lives of the people — power in the trade unions, in peasant organizations, in the cultural life of nationalities, freedom of women in public and private life, and a tremendous development of education for adults and children. . . .

I saw in the Soviet Union many opponents of the regime. I visited a dozen prisons — the political sections among them. I saw considerable of the work of the OGPU. I heard a good many stories of severity, even of brutality, and many of them from the victims. While I sympathized with personal distress I just could not bring myself to get excited over the suppression of opposition when I stacked it up against what I saw of fresh, vigorous expressions of free living by workers and peasants all over the land. And further, no champion of a socialist society could fail to see that some suppression was necessary to achieve it. It could not all be done by persuasion.
I've long thought that the ACLU was irrationally idealistic. Certainly, Roger Baldwin wasn't. The defense of civil liberties, to Baldwin, were a means to an end--and if "suppression of opposition" and the brutality of the secret police were necessary to that end--oh well! I'm not convinced anything is different with the ACLU today.


 
Racism in the Aftermath of Katrina

Martin Luther King, Jr., once called 11:00 AM Sunday morning the most segregated hour in America. I don't know if that was really true back then, but I'll take his word for it. It certainly isn't true now--generally, churches that I have attended are better racially integrated than most companies that I have worked for--and these haven't been lily-white companies, either.

Here's a collection of photographs showing volunteers and evacuees. A lot of churches across America have stepped up to the plate to help the evacuees, and what I am seeing is a reminder that the days that Dr. King complained about are gone.

You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. [Galatians 3:26-28]


 
A New Definition of "Extreme Right-Wing"

Governor Schwarzenegger announced that he would veto a same-sex marriage bill passed by the California legislature, and his reason for it was that five years ago, a majority--a rather strong majority at that--of California voters passed an initiative defining marriage as "one man, one woman." So what was the response of advocates for the bill?
"Clearly he's pandering to an extreme right wing, which was not how he got elected," said Geoff Kors, executive director of Equality California, one of the bill's sponsors.
Proposition 22, which defined marriage as "one man, one woman" received a Yes vote from 61.4% of the voters at the March 2000 election. So I guess in gayspeak, 61.4% of the population of California--one of the most liberal states in the nation--are "extreme right wing."

UPDATE: Professor Volokh linked to this, but wasn't too happy with my use of the term "gayspeak." It was an intentional parody of the Orwellian "newspeak." If a spokesman for the most important gay rights group in California (other than the Democratic Party) decides to redefine a huge majority of the electorate in one of the most liberal states as "extreme right-wing," it just screams for a parallel to 1984's attempt to redefine reality by twisting language.

UPDATE 2: Someone commenting over at Volokh Conspiracy pointed out that many voters did not vote yes or no on Proposition 22. Very true. I think we can safely assume that if someone chose not to vote on Proposition 22, they didn't care very strongly about the question of same-sex marriage--not enough to vote NO on a measure that was intended to prevent gay marriage.

UPDATE 3: The number of March voters who didn't vote on Proposition 22 turned out to be pretty tiny, however. There were 7,627,690 votes cast in the presidential primary; for Proposition 22, 4,618,673 voted yes, and 2,909,370 voted no. That means that 98.7% of the voters expressed an opinion.


 
What Failed in New Orleans?

Fat Steve's Blatherings argues
that the City of New Orleans largely implemented their hurricane evacuation plan--but that the plan was that if you didn't have a car, or a way to hitch a ride, tough luck:
There've been a lot of reports about New Orleans failing to implement its own disaster plans, especially about how the didn't use the buses it had available to get people without cars out of the city. These claims are only partially true.

* The City of New Orleans’s official plan for getting people out of "the bowl" was to tell them 'Leave town,' but do nothing to help them leave if they didn't have cars. That's exactly what the city did.

* The plan for those who couldn't leave was in two parts: a) tell them 'Hitch a ride;' b) move them around in the city. NOLA didn't do a), it did do b).

* The city could have evacuated over 40% of those without transportation in one effort, using city buses, and everyone in three trips — but the plan for evacuating people on buses was 'Don't even try.' And they didn't.

So New Orleans’s emergency plan was mostly implemented. As predicted by many, thousands died. Objectively, letting them die was the city's policy.
If he is correct about this, it would appear that the New Orleans government either had no idea of how severe this was going to be (in which case, why tell everyone with cars to evacuate?), or simply didn't care what happened to the poor, the mentally ill, the homeless, and the hospitalized.

If you want to blame the federal government for failing to pre-position emergency crews for this, or for failing to respond quickly enough after the hurricane struck, well, we can argue about how well this was planned. But it appears that if there was someone who "didn't care if black people died or not," it would appear to have been the City of New Orleans government that best fit that description.

Oh, and here's a sharp piece of parody, concerning all those school buses that New Orleans city government chose not to use for evacuation, so that they would available to pollute the floodwaters instead.


Wednesday, September 07, 2005
 
A Machining Aha! Moment

I was trying to fall asleep, considering the various emails I received in response to my last machining perplexity, and I had one of those Aha! moments, rather like Kekule solving the benzene ring problem. (Okay, he didn't really solve it, but he started organic chemists on the path to solving it. And no, my revelation wasn't quite as important.)

The problem is that I can't hold a cylinder in a three jaw chuck and turn the entire length of the cylinder to a particular diameter without reversing it in the chuck. Reversing the cylinder doesn't put it in exactly the same position as it was in before. It is close--perhaps within .001 inches or less--but turning the diameter again leaves a palpable ring where you stop turning the cylinder on the second pass.

I contacted Sherline, to ask if they had a tool that would allow me to screw the cylinder onto a threaded stud that screwed onto the headstock. Nope. The stock that I am turning is too large to fit through the headstock. The solution came to me as I tried to fall asleep.

I turn a holding cylinder of plastic that fits into the three jaw chuck, then drill and tap a 3/8"-16 hole through the exact center of the holding cylinder. I relieve the underside of the holding cylinder so that a 3/8"-16 bolt goes through the hole--and threads into the workpiece. (This may require a lockwasher between the holding cylinder and the workpiece to prevent it from loosening while turning.)

The holding cylinder occupies the entire space of the jaws in the three jaw chuck, so I can advance the turning tool down the entire length of the workpiece, with no danger of hitting the jaws of the chuck--and with no need to reverse it.

My manufacturing procedure then becomes:

1. Cut a 1.25" piece of Delrin from the long piece of 1 1/4" cylinder.

2. Put the workpiece in the three jaw chuck to face end A. (To "face" means that you are making the end a perfectly flat, 90 degree angle from the cylinder walls.)

3. Reverse the workpiece in the three jaw chuck to face end B.

4. Put a center drill in the tailstock chuck.

5. Make a center hole in end B.

6. Put a 5/16" twist drill in the tailstock chuck.

7. Make a 5/16" hole in end B.

8. Tap the hole to accept 3/8"-16 bolt.

9. Screw the 3/8"-16 bolt through the holding cylinder into end B.

10. Put the holding cylinder in the three jaw chuck.

11. Turn the workpiece to 1.23" diameter.

This sounds like a lot of steps, but the trick to any sort of machining is division of labor. Adam Smith's description of pin making in Wealth of Nations (1776) talks about a division of labor by workers, but for machining, it can be division of labor for operations. You don't make one item, going through all eleven steps above, because each time you change a drill, you are spending valuable time. Instead, you perform step #1 thirty times, then step #2 thirty times, and so on. This allows you only spend time performing steps #4 and #6 (changing drills) once for all thirty pieces.


 
Fluent In Spanish?


ScopeRoller
needs two very short instruction sheets translated, a total of about 1100 words. If you can help me out, contact me pronto.


 
The Case For Free Television Time For Political Ads

From Germany:
BERLIN (Reuters) - A fringe German anarchist party has outraged national television audiences with its election campaign television spot -- a video montage of booze-fuelled chaos, syringe needles and men cavorting with topless women.

...

Rather than offer any presentation of policies, the party's campaign spot spliced together scenes of debauched revellers smashing furniture, pouring beer down each other's throats and groups of couples kissing and groping each other, all set to a frantic heavy metal soundtrack.

As an officially registered political party, the Hamburg-based APPD is entitled to free television airtime for its advertisements.
And to think that there are people that want the same thing here!


 
I Think Tide Works Better

But not everyone shares my preferences in laundry detergent:
LONDON (Reuters) - A British Muslim convert charged with plotting acts of terrorism had socks with traces of explosive in his luggage when he was arrested in France, prosecutors told a court Tuesday.

Andrew Rowe, 34, who denies the charges, had been under surveillance by British police for about a year before they asked their French colleagues to hold him in Calais in October 2003 on his way back from a trip to Frankfurt.

A search of his luggage revealed two socks rolled up into balls that had traces of explosive, the prosecutors told the Old Bailey criminal court in London. The socks were connected by a length of cord.


 
Why Is Gasoline Expensive Right Now?

Partly because there are only 149 refineries in the country--and no new ones have been built since 1976. (The environmentalists won't allow it.) Not surprisingly, we have to actually import 10% of our gasoline, because we don't have the refining capacity in the U.S. to refine all the crude oil we need. Reason has an article here about who is preventing the building of refineries.

Just for those who weren't paying attention in economics class: retail prices are not set (at least, directly) by wholesale prices. Retail prices are determined by what people are prepared to pay. Here in Boise, gasoline at the Albertson's at Eagle & Macmillan is typically eight to ten cents a gallon more expensive than the Albertson's at Five Mile Road & Ustick, which is only four miles away. They are both in the same city, so there's no regulatory difference, and transportation cost differences are trivial--perhaps .0000001 per gallon difference. The stations are owned by the same company, and they are selling the same product.

What makes the difference? The one at Eagle & Macmillan is near HP, and on a state highway headed towards McCall. It gets a lot more traffic, and because of its proximity to HP, much more affluent traffic. These are people that can afford to pay more, and the prices are set to "clear the market."

What does "clear the market" mean? The station manager (or more likely, someone at corporate) raises the price if the station is starting to run low on gasoline, and lowers the price if he isn't selling gasoline fast enough to refill his tanks when the tanker truck shows up next. They probably won't cut the price to a point where there is no profit on every sale, but in a community this wealthy, that's not usually a problem.

The price is set based on demand--not on the cost of doing business (at least, not directly). If the supplier raises the wholesale price of gasoline by ten cents a gallon, it doesn't mean that the station can just automatically add ten cents a gallon to the retail price. If consumers tolerate paying the extra ten cents a gallon, the station will raise the price regardless of whether the wholesale price went up, stayed the same, or went down. There is no direct connection between the wholesale and retail prices.

There is an indirect connection, however. What happens if the wholesale price goes up thirty cents a gallon, and the station now loses money with every gallon it sells? The station can try raising the price--and see a big reduction in sales, as people decide, "I really don't need to drive to McCall this weekend." More likely, if the wholesale price goes up enough to wipe out the station's profit margin, and it looks like this situation isn't going to change, the station will probably close down. (I'm old enough to remember when gas stations were a lot more common than they are now.)

Generally speaking, if the wholesale price to one station goes up, the wholesale price to other stations goes up as well. If there are still consumers willing to pay $3 a gallon for gasoline, then every station is free to raise their retail price to that level. In short, higher gasoline prices are present because consumers aren't willing to change their habits--they consider $3 a gallon gasoline to still be better than the alternatives, such as walking, bicycling, not driving to McCall for the weekend.

If you want to see gasoline get a lot cheaper, the only practical solution is for there to be more gasoline available to sell than there are consumers willing to buy it. That means we need either more refineries, making more gasoline, or we need fewer consumers gulping gasoline in vast quantities. I know of a person who commutes about 30 miles each way by enormous truck to work--and is now starting to pay $90 each time he fills his tank. I believe that this will be self-correcting in the very near future. He will either buy something with better mileage, find a job closer to home, or a home closer to work.


 
The ACLU's Interesting History

Regular readers of this blog know that I am no fan of the ACLU--at least, in its present form. It is an organization that, post-Skokie, has often taken positions that are contrary to its own traditional notion of civil liberties (for example, anti-discrimination laws for homosexuals take precedence over freedom of association, as in the Boy Scouts suits).

It has argued (successfully, to the idiots that control the Supreme Court) that virtual child pornography is protected by the First Amendment--even though it is very clear that this would have been unlawful in every state when the states ratified the First Amendment.

It has ignored parts of the Bill of Rights that are uncomfortable for the overwhelmingly leftist makeup of its membership (such as the Second Amendment).

It has taken a position on the meaning of the establishment clause that is contrary to the historical evidence of what Congress and the states meant for it to do.

In some cases, you wonder if the ACLU has any shame at all--such as lawsuits claiming that the sight of a Ten Commandments monument in a public park causes the plaintiff "physical pain." (And the judge accepted this clearly false statement, instead of reminding the plaintiff about the perjury statute.)

Perhaps most insidiously, it has claimed that some things are constitutionally protected civil liberties whichwere felonies in every state when Congress passed the Bill of Rights.

It has done likewise in claiming that minors have a constitutional right to have sex with adults--which in practice, means that adults have a constitutional right to manipulate minors into sex. (I think it is no coincidence that the Kansas case in which they made this argument involved a homosexual adult having sex with a minor.)

I've seen some bizarre claims made about the ACLU's history, but because they came from what I regarded as slightly nutcase sorts, I didn't take them too seriously. Now I see Professor Volokh--who just doesn't seem to understand why I hold the ACLU in such contempt--making claims that are even more bizarre:
This post is about one such item, which I think is emblematic of three not uncommon errors in some liberal circles: A tendency to overextend constitutional norms from government action to private action; a tendency to overlabel action as McCarthyism or close to it; and a tendency to miss the real threat that Communism posed in its heyday.

It turns out (I didn't know this until last year) that in 1940, the ACLU formally barred Communists from leadership or staff positions, and either then or later took the position that it didn't even want them as members. And it also turns out that many people, including at least one First Amendment scholar whose work I much admire, have since then faulted the ACLU for this, calling it a sign of "falter[ing]" in an "organization[] dedicated to the protection of civil liberties." (In the late 1960s, there was even a strong internal ACLU movement to remove this bar, on the grounds that it was wrong from the outset.)

...

In the 1930s, there were indeed some Communists, and more Communist sympathizers, in important positions at the ACLU. As one might expect, the Communists tried to bend the ACLU to the party line, for instance by making the ACLU soften its criticism of Communist attempts to violently suppress speech in the U.S.

And why not? Communists really weren't interested in protecting free speech; they were interested in defending Communism and the Soviets. (Joining groups and then influencing them to serve the Party's ends was standard procedure for the Communists, and they were apparently quite good at it.) And on top of that, with the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, and the U.S. Communist Party's lockstep move away towards support for Nazi Germany — a position that was rightly anathema even to those who had been blind to Communism's many other sins — the dangers of influence by Communists were even clearer.

...

The ACLU's founding director and likely most influential official, Roger Baldwin, had long been an admitted supporter of communism as an economic system, and on balance an apologist for the Soviet Union. Though he criticized the Soviets at times, he had also praised the USSR as on balance a haven for liberty. His true break with the Soviets (which ultimately brought him around to pretty vociferous anti-Communism) came not with Stalin's ascent, not with the Ukrainian famine, not with the Terror and the show trials — he defended the Soviets even after that — but only in 1939, with the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.

On top of that, Baldwin was on the record as having said that his commitment to civil liberties for supposed reactionaries was sheerly instrumental, just a tool for advancing the cause of communism. His struggle for free speech, he said, was just incidental to the class struggle, a useful tactic for furthering communist goals. When the working class took over, the resulting regime should be supported by any means necessary, including dictatorship. Dictatorship and suppression of civil liberties would be necessary to get to a socialist society, so such suppression is justified. That was the position of the founding director of the ACLU.
Read the whole thing--and then read the comments. Some of them just make me roll my eyes in astonishment.


 
Monstrous Stories

This news account just makes you shudder:
State Rep. Nita Hutter said 30 people died at a flooded-out nursing home in Chalmette, just outside New Orleans. She said the staff left the elderly residents behind in their beds. And more than 100 people died at a dockside warehouse, waiting for rescuers to ferry them to safety, said Rep. Charlie Melancon, whose congressional district includes the area.
My first reaction is anger at the nursing home staff--but my second reaction is to think of what they were thinking, as the flood waters rose, and there was no one to evacuate these elderly people, many of whom were probably going to die soon anyway.
The core problem was that the city's evacuation plan was either insufficient, or not carried out properly.

And the same report tells me that here's a crowd that needs to be shot on sight:
Meanwhile, firefighters battled blazes around New Orleans - an emerging threat in a city where the water pressure is too low to fight fires and where many people are using candles because of the lack of electricity. At the same time, workers returning to restart essential services came under sniper fire.

"We have got some information where, some possible shooters have been shooting at some employees trying to get in to the city to actually get it back up and running," police Sgt. Charlie Smith said.
UPDATE: Elsewhere in that story is one of those statements that would normally make you ask, "Delirum tremens, schizophrenia, or LSD?" But in the bizarre, Hieronymus Bosch-like world of New Orleans, this doesn't seem impossible or even unlikely:
Several residents said they heard Nagin's latest order on portable radios and were reluctantly complying.

Dolores Devron and her husband, Forcell, finally agreed to go. Dolores Devron said she was relieved the couple were allowed to take their dog with them but angry they were ordered out.

"There are dead babies tied to poles and they're dragging us out and leaving the dead babies. That ain't right!" she screamed, waving her arms as she was directed onto a troop carrier truck.


Tuesday, September 06, 2005
 
ScopeRoller Adds Another Country!

I received a shipping quote request from a customer in Spain.


 
The Atrocity Stories Are Now Getting Confirmation

National Guard soldiers being quoted:
Arkansas National Guardsman Mikel Brooks stepped through the food service entrance of the Ernest N. Morial Convention Center Monday, flipped on the light at the end of his machine gun, and started pointing out bodies.

"Don't step in that blood - it's contaminated," he said. "That one with his arm sticking up in the air, he's an old man."
Then he shined the light on the smaller human figure under the white sheet next to the elderly man.

"That's a kid," he said. "There's another one in the freezer, a 7-year-old with her throat cut."

He moved on, walking quickly through the darkness, pulling his camouflage shirt to his face to screen out the overwhelming odor.
"There's an old woman," he said, pointing to a wheelchair covered by a sheet. "I escorted her in myself. And that old man got bludgeoned to death," he said of the body lying on the floor next to the wheelchair.

Brooks and several other Guardsmen said they had seen between 30 and 40 more bodies in the Convention Center's freezer. "It's not on, but at least you can shut the door," said fellow Guardsman Phillip Thompson.

...

Of the four bodies that lay just inside the food service entrance of the Convention Center, the woman in the wheelchair rattled Brooks the most. When he found her two days before among the sea of suffering in front of the Convention Center where one of the last refugee camps evacuated, her husband sat next to her. He had only one concern when Brooks and some of his comrades carted her away.

"Bring me back my wheelchair," he recalled the man telling him.

One of the bodies, they said, was a girl they estimated to be 5 years old. Though they could not confirm it, they had heard she was gang-raped.

"There was an old lady that said the little girl had been raped by two or three guys, and that she had told another unit. But they said they couldn't do anything about it with all the people there," Brooks said. "I would have put him in cuffs, stuck him in the freezer and left him there."
Race was definitely an issue in what happened, no question. From a BBC account:
Jamie Trout 22, from Sunderland, was among 50 tourists stranded in horrific conditions in the devastated city.

They had joined up to 30,000 other people taking refuge from Hurricane Katrina in the venue.

But Mr Trout's family said the group was escorted to a nearby hotel by the National Guard after the Britons were targeted by others in the shelter.

The graduate economics student was travelling in the US when he was caught up in the devastation of the hurricane.

I'm very pleased that he's out of the dome but I'm worried that nothing is being done to get them away from the place.

He had also been coaching football to disabled children as part of the Camp America scheme.

Mr Trout's brother Jonathan said: "We got a text message from someone whose phone was working which said he was alive but in terrible conditions.

"Then last night our mother got a call saying the situation had deteriorated.

"He witnessed a good deal of violence, with scuffles going on and people breaking things.

"The group really feared for their safety because they were being targeted because they were the only white people there.

"The National Guard moved them out into the basketball stadium next door where the very sick were being held."
And this account from the Australian newspaper The Age:
NINE Australians witnessed a rapid descent into hell inside the New Orleans Superdome as they sat trapped inside for four long days and nights.

The Aussies stuck together and the men protected the women, forming a tight circle around them while gangs prowled the stadium preying on women, children and the weak.

"I haven't been to hell, but now I think I saw it inside that stadium," Anthony "Bud" Hopes, 32, of Brisbane, said.

Mr Hopes emerged as a hero for the Australians, fending off threats from gangs who wanted to rob them and drag the women away.

The Australians were finally rescued yesterday and put on a bus for Dallas. They told of the mounting horror as days dragged by without help.

"It was somewhere between a disaster area full of refugees and a jail," Mr Hopes said.

"The girls were in real danger. We knew we had to stick together. We were a minority group inside a stadium with 25,000 people.

"There were gangsters, thugs, rapists, child molesters, anything you want to put in there, it was in there. They were molesting children that we saw. If girls from our group walked to the toilet they were felt up and filthy comments made to them. It was horrible, terrible.
I'm sure that this did wonders for their view of black Americans.


 
You Gotta Read This One!

Sean Penn, good leftist actor, demonstrates his concern for the suffering of New Orleans, and his generally high competence:
Movie star and political activist Penn, 45, was in the collapsing city to aid stranded victims of flooding sparked by Hurricane Katrina, but the small boat he was piloting to launch a rescue attempt sprang a leak.

The outspoken actor had planned to rescue children waylaid by the deadly waters, but apparently forgot to plug a hole in the bottom of the vessel, which began taking water within seconds of its launch.

When the boat's motor failed to start, those aboard were forced to use paddles to propel themselves down the flooded New Orleans street.

Asked what he had hoped to achieve in the waterlogged city, the actor replied: "Whatever I can do to help."

But with the boat loaded with members of the Oscar-winner's entourage, including his personal photographer, one bystander taunted: "How are you going to get any people in that thing?"
Gateway Pundit has a great picture of Sean Penn trying to bail out his rescue boat.

Over at Hog On Ice there is a more technical explanation of Penn's failure--and the point well made that this was a publicity stunt, not a serious effort:
It had to be the drain plug, because boats don't just "spring leaks." And Penn continued on his way after the problem was fixed, which shows it was a leak that could be fixed very quickly. That's a drain plug, all right.

It's wonderful that Penn is taking an interest in the survivors, but wouldn't it be smarter to do what John Grisham did and donate five million dollars and then stay out of the way?

You may think I'm picking on a person with good intentions, but that only shows that you're naive. For maybe thirty thousand dollars, Penn could have bought an enormous shallow-draft boat that could have held forty people at a time. If he had rented, he could have done even better. Instead, he hopped on a crappy little boat which clearly cost next to nothing, and he filled it with butt boys and photographers, and he accomplished nothing, except the garnering of publicity. Which was the real goal.


 
Oh Dear! More Intolerance of Diversity

There's a university. There's a professor of astronomy. There's a professor of "religious studies." They don't agree about this intelligent design thing--and one of them claims that the other one is trying to create a hostile work environment because of his research. Want to guess which one is the intelligent design advocate, and which one is circulating petitions that supposedly cause the "hostile work environment"?
An astronomy professor at Iowa State University who is nationally known for his research on intelligent design says the school has a phony view of diversity when it comes to the subject of the origin of life.

More than 120 ISU faculty members -- about seven percent of the faculty -- have signed a petition opposing the teaching of intelligent design as a scientific fact. "Whether one believes in a creator or not," reads the petition, "views regarding a supernatural creator are, by their very nature, claims of religious faith, and not within the scope or abilities of science." The petition continues, urging all faculty members to "uphold the integrity of our university of science and technology, and convey to students and the general public the importance of methodological naturalism in science and reject efforts to portray Intelligent Design as science."

The petition is being circulated by Hector Avalos, who is an associate professor of religious studies at the Ames, Iowa, school. Astronomy prof Guillermo Gonzalez says because he is the only intelligent design proponent on campus, the petition is a "thinly veiled attack" on him -- and he claims it has resulted in a hostile work environment for him.

Labels:



 
The Divine Retribution Idea

There are people in New Orleans who are now partial to the idea that what has happened was some sort of judgment for being a sinful city:
Yesterday Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco called for a state-wide day of prayer. "As we face the devastation wrought by Katrina, as we search for those in need, as we comfort those in pain and as we begin the long task of rebuilding, we turn to God for strength, hope and comfort," she said. Meanwhile, New Orleans City Council President Oliver Thomas after witnessing the horrors first hand and hearing talk of Sodom and Gomorrah commented, "Maybe God's going to cleanse us."

The theme of cleansing or purification has become a frequently discussed topic as the tragedy in the affected states unfolds. European papers have suggested that Katrina was the punishment the US received for failing to sign onto the Kyoto accord, Islamic militants have rejoiced that "private" Katrina has joined in the holy war against the U.S. for - among other things - the Iraq war. Some have even suggested that the hurricane was God's punishment on the U.S. for cooperating in the removal of Jews from the Gaza strip.

However, beyond these speculations is a more general acknowledgement that New Orleans, the epicentre of the disaster, was a "sin city" which harboured few rivals. The New Orleans "southern decadence" festival which was to take place Labour Day weekend, is described by a French Quarter tourism site as "sort of like a gayer version of Mardi Gras" which is "most famous (or infamous) for the displays of naked flesh which characterize the event," with "public displays of sexuality . . . pretty much everywhere you look."
If you find this idea offensive or ridiculous--ask yourself if the ideas popular in leftist circles that this was a punishment of the U.S. for the war in Iraq, or not signing the Kyoto Treaty, any less offensive.

It would appear that the corruption and incompetence that is at the core of Louisiana government (and has been that way for decades) played a part in how insufficiently New Orleans was evacuated. While it appears that some of the worst news reports may have been exaggerated or even made up, it does not seem that there is any serious question that savages took over New Orleans after the hurricane--even firing on workers trying to repair the levees. You can't run a society based on the idea that there is nothing right or wrong without some people starting to take that seriously--and operating as though there is nothing right or wrong.


 
Some Of The More Outrageous News Stories Are Beginning To Smell

I've updated this discussion of the problem of values to point out that there is now serious reason to question whether the more horrifying stories that have appeared about the aftermath of Katrina really happened.

Randall Robinson has now retracted his obviously absurd claim about black cannibals in New Orleans. (Of course, I pointed out that it was absurd when it first appeared.)

UPDATE: See my more recent blog entry that confirms that except for the cannibalism, the atrocity stories are turning out to be true, with National Guardsmen showing some of the bodies to reporters, and eyewitness accounts that are sickening in the racism it revealed. The left won't much care, however, because the racism was going "the right direction."


Monday, September 05, 2005
 
An Interesting New Piece of Malware

I still don't approve, but I must confess, it will be amusing to watch liberals fight two impulses:

1. Should I be angry that this virus is preventing me from engaging in my unknown and unknowable deity-given right to watch porn?

2. Should I just accept it because it is part of their culture?

From IT Week:
ecurity experts today issued a warning after detecting a malicious Trojan horse which tries to interrupt the surfing of adult websites by displaying messages from the Koran.

The Yusufali-A Trojan monitors users' surfing habits by examining the title bar of the active window.

If the Trojan finds a key word such as 'teen', 'xx', 'sex' or 'penis', it minimises the window so that the user cannot see its content and displays a message from the Koran instead.

The message, which is partly written in Arabic, contains the following English text: "Yusufali: Know, therefore, that there is no god but Allah, and ask forgiveness for they fault, and for the men and women who believe: for Allah knows how ye move about and how ye dwell in your homes."

Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, said: "Unlike other malware, it appears that this Trojan isn't trying to steal money or confidential information, but acts as a moral guardian instead, blocking the viewing of websites it determines as unsavoury.

"Of course, it's possible for the Trojan to make mistakes and block sites that are not pornographic, such as medical sites or social sites designed for teenagers."


 
It Isn't About Race

It's about values. Here's a rambling blog entry that, if you are prepared to put up with some mildly coarse language and a desperate need for an editor, makes some very good points. There's nothing terribly quotable there, but his essential point is that a lot of leftists are claiming that if you had sent a bunch of white, middle class conservatives to the Superdome in New Orleans, that they would have behaved just as badly as the poor largely black people that ended up there.

Nope. Indeed, we are seeing examples of how poor people in New Orleans managed to work together to rescue neighbors, provide for the common defense against the thugs, and in general, look out for themselves. What happened in the Superdome--by some accounts, with children as young as seven years old being raped--is an indication that a lot of people who ended up at the Superdome should have been sent to prison some years ago, and left there. Few people without a criminal history just wake up one morning and say, "I'm having a rough day because of the flood, so I think I'll go destroy the innocence of a seven year old, perhaps give her an STD in the process, and probably cause substantial internal damage." I think I can say, from my reading of the characteristics of violent criminals, that such a monster doesn't make it to 21 without a substantial criminal history.

UPDATE: Some journalists are beginning to report that attempts to verify these horrifying accounts suggest that they may not be true. The Guardian, for example, reports:
There were two babies who had their throats slit. The seven-year-old girl who was raped and murdered in the Superdome. And the corpses laid out amid the excrement in the convention centre.
In a week filled with dreadful scenes of desperation and anger from New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina some stories stood out.

But as time goes on many remain unsubstantiated and may yet prove to be apocryphal.

New Orleans police have been unable to confirm the tale of the raped child, or indeed any of the reports of rapes, in the Superdome and convention centre.

...

Nor has the source for the story of the murdered babies, or indeed their bodies, been found. And while the floor of the convention centre toilets were indeed covered in excrement, the Guardian found no corpses.

During a week when communications were difficult, rumours have acquired a particular currency. They acquired through repetition the status of established facts.
Michelle Malkin points to this story by Alenda Lux that suggests that someone at Reuters is being a little...creative...in their coverage:
Reuters, and no other media outlet besides Reuters, has a story about National Guardsmen and Police slaughtering kids in New Orleans that is so outrageous it beggars disbelief.

...

Reuters is the only one reporting this story, and "Wade Batiste, 48" is the only one telling this story. I'm sure there are probably a few Wade Batistes in the city of New Orleans, but what is the likelihood of "Wade Batiste" being the subject of two separate stories: witnessing police slaughtering children in New Orleans while also applying to work at a McDonalds while being a resident with his family at the Astrodome in Houston?


 
I Really Like Machining Delrin

And I am beginning to reach the point where I can call myself an very low grade amateur machinist, not just someone playing with a lathe. I wanted to make a cylinder of Delrin that was 1.240" diameter and 1.00" long from a piece of Delrin 1.252" diameter and 1.20" long. I knew that each rotation of the screw would move the carriage .050". I rotated the screw four times, more or less, and got a 0.98" length cylinder. A similar change to the cross-slide handwheel should give me a piece about 1.24" diameter; I actually ended up with a piece 1.23" diameter.

The only area that is still a source of frustration is that I am still holding the workpiece in a three jaw chuck, so I can't turn the entire length of the workpiece at once. I have to turn it down to the jaws, reverse the piece, and resume the process. This gives me roughly the right diameter--but only roughly, because three jaw chucks are necessarily imprecise, and you don't end up with it in exactly the same position each time.

Unfortunately, Sherline doesn't make a lathe dog big enough to hold this piece, and the only other solution that seems to make sense--a wood turning point to hold the piece in place--doesn't work for what I need to do with this piece afterwards. I think the right solution is some sort of adapter that allows me to place a threaded screw on the headstock, and thread a hole in the workpiece. (I have to have a threaded hole in one end anyway.) I guess I'll call Sherline tomorrow and see if they have anything like this--perhaps a standard fixture that lets you put a screw exactly in the center of the faceplate.

I've been experimenting with brass, aluminum, and UHMW until now, and Delrin is so much nicer! It is softer than brass or aluminum, so it cuts more easily. At the same time, it is harder than UHMW, so the cutting tool leaves a much smoother, more consistent surface when facing or turning.


 
Labor Shouldn't Be In Short Supply

As I was watching news coverage of the rescue operations, I was struck by something: how much of the labor moving water and food was being done by soldiers. I know that many of those who were stuck in New Orleans were elderly, and others are just children, but why don't we see large numbers of these refugees involved in moving relief supplies? This is just a little disturbing. You might almost get the impression that the reason so many were stuck in New Orleans when the hurricane hit was a certain unwillingness to do anything for themselves.


 
"A Criminal Will Just Take The Gun Away From You" Part 2

I mentioned a few days ago that a recurring gun control argument is that law-abiding people--especially women--shouldn't try to use a gun in self-defense because a criminal will just take away your gun, and this make things worse! It is a fascinating insight in the gun control mentality--that only criminals can use guns, and even worse, women are "the weaker sex" lacking the mental toughness to shoot a criminal who is threatening them with rape, death, or the combination of the two.

One of my readers brought to my attention this interesting news story from the July 20, 2005 Savannah Morning News where, instead of the criminal disarming the victim (something that happens quite rarely, except to police officers), two different victims disarmed the criminals--and used the guns against those criminals:
The Chatham County Grand Jury on Wednesday indicted three men in two, unrelated cases have something in common. In both, the victims took away the accused robbers' guns and turned them on their assailants.

In the first case, grand jurors indicted two cousins on charges they sexually assaulted and robbed a woman at gunpoint at the Tatemville Community Park in April.

Eric Mikell and Morris Easterling are charged with two counts of armed robbery, aggravated sodomy and aggravated assault. Easterling is also charged with rape.

The rape victim identified Easterling at a preliminary hearing held in May and testified that he raped her.

...

During the attack, the woman wrestled away Easterling's gun and managed to shoot Mikell in the neck. The cousins ran away after she shot at them. Mikell was not seriously injured.

In the unrelated case, the grand jurors indicted a Benedictine Military School student on charges he held-up a Wilmington Island McDonald's the night of his school's prom.

Cole McEachern, a sophomore at the time of the robbery, is charged with three counts of aggravated assault, armed robbery, kidnapping, kidnapping with bodily injury, aggravated battery, burglary and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime.

Kerry Bennett, manager at the McDonalds on Johnny Mercer Boulevard, was shot in the left forearm while he was trying to wrestle away McEachern's gun. Bennett got it and shot the teenager in the groin, according to police reports.
Of course, the vast majority of violent crimes are committed under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs (because of their disinhibiting effects), so perhaps we should not be surprised if the victims managed to disarm the criminals.

Now, I'm not recommending that you make a habit of taking guns away from criminals. It does suggest that criminals sometimes lack the lightning reflexes required to shoot you before you get your own gun out. I know someone who used to demonstrate this with a couple of cap guns. He would have the skeptic hold one cap gun, knowing that my friend was going to draw the other cap gun from concealment, and fire it. From what he told me, the guy playing the criminal seldom managed to fire it before my friend would draw and fire his cap gun.


Sunday, September 04, 2005
 
House Project: Second Round of Water Tests

I had mentioned that the first water tests indicated very high lead levels: according to the test results, .100 mg/L. Anyway, the second set of results, after draining the water tank and refilling from the well, gives .015 mg/L of lead (or 15 micrograms per liter)--the EPA action level for lead in public water supplies. This is still a bit higher than I would like to see, so I guess that I will be buying reverse osmosis units for the kitchen and bathroom sinks. (There is apparently no whole house filtering system for lead that produces enough water.)

I am tempted to install a whole house particulate matter filter first, and run the tests one more time. If this lead is in a fine particular form, I won't need the reverse osmosis filters.

Labels:



 
Volunteers in New Orleans

Geraldo Rivera on Fox News this morning was showing something that the left isn't going to admit is happening--because it won't fit into their "Amerikkka is a racist nation that hates black people" theme.

White guys from upstate Louisiana are driving down to New Orleans, dropping their boats into the water, and going searching for people to rescue. (Oh yes, heavily armed--they know that they are going into potentially dangerous areas.) At least all the film that Fox showed involved white guys rescuing black people. From Rivera's account, there are lots of these volunteers going around to save complete strangers. The city has a total of three boats available to do this--and two of them are of action because of mechanical problems.