The advertising above is just a source of revenue. If the ads get offensive enough, I may drop them.

Clayton Cramer's BLOG

Clayton's commentary on news and events of the day. Broadly speaking, I'm a conservative with libertarian sympathies (getting more conservative as my children get older).



Email me at blogmail at claytoncramer dot com. Sorry to be so indirect, but all spambots must die! But they haven't died yet! Include the word spamIamnot in your subject line to make sure that my spam blocker lets you through.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Friday, September 16, 2005
 
Too Stupid To Stay Out of Prison

I mentioned a few days ago a guy who called the police to complain that a neighbor stole his marijuana plants. (They hadn't been stolen at all.) I've also mentioned a variety of idiots who videotaped themselves committing various serious crimes.

Here's another person unclear on the concept of "illegal":
TOKYO (Reuters) - A Japanese woman called in the police after a hitman she paid to kill her lover's wife failed to carry out the job.

The 32-year-old Tokyo woman was arrested Wednesday for incitement to murder, the Daily Yomiuri newspaper said Friday.

The woman contacted a private detective through a Web site last November and paid him 1 million yen in cash to murder her love rival, the paper said.


 
I Don't Know That I Believe This Story

But it's a great story, especially entertaining for those of us who live in dry climates, and on occasion produce visible electric discharges without even trying:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - An Australian man built up a 40,000-volt charge of static electricity in his clothes as he walked, leaving a trail of scorched carpet and molten plastic and forcing firefighters to evacuate a building.

Frank Clewer, who was wearing a woolen shirt and a synthetic nylon jacket, was oblivious to the growing electrical current that was building up as his clothes rubbed together.

When he walked into a building in the country town of Warrnambool in the southern state of Victoria Thursday, the electrical charge ignited the carpet.

"It sounded almost like a firecracker," Clewer told Australian radio Friday.

"Within about five minutes, the carpet started to erupt."

Employees, unsure of the cause of the mysterious burning smell, telephoned firefighters who evacuated the building.


 
This Month's Winner of The Ann Coulter Award for Most Inflammatory Article

You know, I do believe that racial profiling with respect to terrorism is legitimate. If you have a bunch of Middle Eastern men getting on an airliner, it seems quite sensible to give them a somewhat more thorough security check than say, a five year old, or an 80 year old woman. Still, one can get a little carried away with the concept, and certainly how you express it:
WASHINGTON — A student journalist accused of misleading those she interviewed for an inflammatory column about racial profiling of Arabs has been fired, the editor said.

...

Bandes' column, published in the paper Tuesday, argued that racial profiling of Arabs was essential to national security. The column began with the line, "I want all Arabs to be stripped naked and cavity-searched if they get within 100 yards of an airport."
You know, even Ann Coulter is a bit more restrained than that. Now, if her column had started out, "I want all Republicans to be stripped naked and cavity-searched if they get within 100 yards of a voting booth," I rather doubt that the Daily Tar Heel would have given Bandes her walking papers.


 
I'm Sure That There's A Perfectly Innocent Explanation

Oh, absolutely. I'm sure that finding an Egyptian who is unlawfully in the United States with this has nothing to do with terrorism:
Prosecutors say F-B-I agents found an airline pilot's uniform, a chart of Memphis International Airport and instructional D-V-D's. One was titled "How an Airline Captain Should Look and Act."

Mahmoud Maawad is charged with wire fraud and fraudulent use of a Social Security number.

Describing what agents found, Assistant U-S Attorney Steve Parker argued yesterday against releasing Maawad, saying the acts and circumstance of the case are "scary."
Michelle Malkin has more.

A search of the web for that name produces some interesting results. Unfortunately, the first page doesn't exist anymore--it would be interesting to see the rest of the text.


 
Air America: Discrediting The Left Everywhere

Two of Air America's hosts demonstrating Bush Derangement Syndrome:
Two hosts at the liberal radio network Air America are defending Nation of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan - saying he's not wrong to suspect that white people deliberately blew up the levees in New Orleans.

"You cannot blame people for coming up with conspiracy theories," Air America host Chuck D. said, after he was asked Thursday about the paranoid pronouncement by MSNBC's Tucker Carlson.

...

Carlson gave him a second chance to denounce Farrakhan's lunatic declaration, saying, "You're a smart guy. You know that white people didn't blow up the levees to kill black people. You've gotta know that didn't happen."

But the Air America host refused to budge, insisting instead that there was a chance Farrakhan could be right.
I am reminded of PBS documentary some years ago in which Watts community activists insisted that the gun violence problem there was because police helicopters airdropped guns onto the streets of South Central Los Angeles, because otherwise gang members wouldn't have guns.

Thanks to Michelle Malkin for pointing to this piece of insanity.


 
IBM Encouraging Career Change

IBM is subsidizing a career change for its employees--to become teachers:
International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), worried the United States is losing its competitive edge, will financially back employees who want to leave the company to become math and science teachers.

The new program, being announced Friday in concert with city and state education officials, reflects tech industry fears that U.S. students are falling behind peers from Bangalore to Beijing in the sciences.

Up to 100 IBM employees will be eligible for the program in its trial phase. Eventually, Big Blue hopes many more of its tech savvy employees - and those in other companies - will follow suit.

The goal is to help fill shortfalls in the nation's teaching ranks, a problem expected to grow with the retirement of today's educators.


Math and science are of particular concern to companies in many U.S. industries that expect to need technical workers but see low test scores in those subjects and waning interest in science careers.

"Over a quarter-million math and science teachers are needed, and it's hard to tell where the pipeline is," said Stanley Litow, head of the IBM Foundation, the Armonk, N.Y.-based company's community service wing. "That is like a ticking time bomb not just for technology companies, but for business and the U.S. economy."
Yup. While the math and science problem is most obvious, and perhaps most critical, I am absolutely shocked and horrified at the low competency in lots of other areas. Here's the core problem, however:
The company expects older workers nearing retirement to be the most likely candidates, partly because they would have more financial wherewithal to take the pay cut that becoming a teacher likely would entail.
Yup. This is the major reason why I can't justify going back to school to get a Ph.D. in History (minimum requirement for full-time employment, even at most community colleges now). It's that vow of poverty that you have to take to teach.

I know more than a few teachers who like to complain that the low rate of pay is some sort of conspiracy by conservatives to denigrate education. No, not really. This is a consequence of at least two factors:

1. Americans don't really care that much about education--at least, not compared to important matters, such as football, beer, and Desperate Housewives. Of course, liberals don't like to admit that the masses aren't terribly wise.

2. Education as an industry is dominated by the government, since at least 90% of all primary and secondary school teachers work in government schools. Of course, liberals don't like to admit that government might be part of the problem.


 
Hold On, California's Legislature Did Something Right

Hey, a million monkeys with a million typewriters...it was bound to happen:
The food served in California schools will be healthier starting next fall under legislation signed Thursday by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The new laws impose a campus ban on the sale of sodas, set a new nutritional standard for vending-machine snacks, and require more fruits and vegetables in meal planning.

The former bodybuilding champion and fitness expert said the new rules are all part of a new effort to fight childhood obesity.

"California is facing an obesity epidemic," Schwarzenegger said at a conference on childhood obesity. "And more and more, children are becoming part of the problem."

Lawmakers made California the first state in the nation to ban the sale of soft drinks in middle and elementary schools two years ago. One of the bills signed by the governor Thursday will expand that ban to include high schools.

Beginning next July, students will be allowed to buy only water, milk, and some fruit and sport drinks that have limited sweeteners.

The governor also signed a bill that will raise nutritional standards for foods sold in school vending machines and regulate the number of calories that can come from fat and sugar. It also takes effect next July.

Another bill provides $18.2 million during this fiscal year to offer more fruits and vegetables in school meal programs.
Look, I enjoy a Coca-Cola as much as anyone. Speaking of monkeys, I have a bit of a Coke monkey on my back. There's enough time as an adult to pick up bad dietary habits, and there's nothing that prevents kids from bringing poor food choices from home. There's certainly no reason for public schools to be encouraging these bad habits.

And yes, a ban on Microsoft software in public schools on similar grounds is tempting, although incompetently written PC software isn't really a public health concern.


 
The Future of Color Laser Printers

I can't tell you the details, for obvious reasons--but I saw what the market leader plans to sell color laser printers for in the next two years--and as a consumer, my reaction is, "Wow!" It is perhaps good that color laser printers are too large to fit into cereal boxes as a premium.


 
Bizarre Conspiracy Theories About New Orleans

I was reading this poll of evacuees this morning, and I found myself wondering if the failure of New Orleans and Louisiana government to take steps at the beginning of this crisis might have had an ulterior motive:
HOUSTON, Sept. 15 -- Fewer than half of all New Orleans evacuees living in emergency shelters here said they will move back home, while two-thirds of those who want to relocate planned to settle permanently in the Houston area, according to a survey by The Washington Post, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and the Harvard School of Public Health.

...

Most already know they have no home left to return to. The overwhelming majority lack insurance to cover their losses. Few have bank checking accounts, savings accounts or credit cards that work. Still, nearly nine in 10 said they were "hopeful" about the future. And while half said they felt depressed about what lies ahead, just a third said they were afraid.

...

The poll vividly documents the immediate and dramatic changes that Hurricane Katrina has brought to two major American cities. It also suggests that what may be occurring is a massive -- and, perhaps, permanent -- transfer of a block of poor people from one city to another. That may have social, economic and political consequences that will be felt for decades, if not generations, in both communities.

Forty-three percent of these evacuees planned to return to New Orleans, the survey found. But just as many -- 44 percent -- said they will settle somewhere else, while the remainder were unsure. Many of those who were planning to return said they will be looking to buy or rent somewhere other than where they lived. Overall, only one in four said they plan to move back into their old homes, the poll found.

...

The poll suggests that the story of these evacuees is not merely about how little they were left with -- it is also about how fragile their lives were even before the storm hit. Together, the findings suggest the long-term challenges posed by the evacuees to local and state governments already cutting back services to their neediest citizens.

According to the poll, six in 10 evacuees had family incomes of less than $20,000 last year. Half have children younger than 18. One in eight was unemployed when the storm hit. Seven in 10 said they have no insurance to cover their losses. Fully half have no health insurance. Four in 10 suffer from heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure or are physically disabled.

When illness or injury strike, they were twice as likely to say they had sought care from hospitals such as the New Orleans Charity Hospital than from either a family doctor or health clinic -- needs for costly services that now will be transferred to hospitals in the Houston area or wherever these evacuees eventually settle.
Hmmm. If worst comes to worst, New Orleans and Louisiana "lose" a big chunk of their poorest, most dependent population, either to drowning or to other states. If liberals can rant and rave with a straight face that Bush didn't care about black people dying in New Orleans, then the, "Nagin and Blanco wanted all these poor people to leave New Orleans permanently" paranoid conspiracy theory makes just as much sense.


 
It Must Be Our Irish Immigrants That Did This

Kelly Clarkson, who seems to be some sort of British celebrity, writes a column for a British tabloid that includes this choice statement:
America may have given the world the space shuttle and, er, condensed milk, but behind the veneer of civilization most Americans barely have the brains to walk on their back legs.
I had a very liberal co-worker from Britain who joked, "Why was the wheelbarrow invented? To get the Irish up on two legs." Isn't liberalism wonderful?


 
The Katrina Economic Crisis Must Be Over

That was quick. I see that the 30 year Treasury yield (as of 9:00 AM Mountain time) is now 4.570%! Considering it was around 4.3% a week ago, that's pretty amazing. Investors are obviously discounting the possibility that the economy is going to slowly sink--or they are expecting that Bush's spending proposals for Katrina relief are going to drive up the deficit again.


Thursday, September 15, 2005
 
Separation of Church & State

Jim Lindgren, who is an atheist, has a rather interesting discussion of the history of "separation of church and state" over here. A few tidbits to drive your favorite ACLU member crazy:
9. In the last part of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century, nativists (including the KKK) popularized separation as an American constitutional principle, eventually leading to a near consensus supporting some form of separation.

10. Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed (or was it the Klansman’s Kreed?). Before he joined the Court, Justice Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the "eternal separation of Church and State." In 1947, Black was the author of Everson, the first Supreme Court case to hold that the first amendment’s establishment clause requires separation of church & state. The suit in Everson was brought by an organization that at various times had ties to the KKK.

11. Until this term, the justices were moving away from the separation metaphor, often failing to mention it except in the titles of cited law review articles, but in the last term of the Court they fell back to using it again.
Of course, that's because "separation of church and state" was originally a mechanism for marginalizing Catholics and preventing Catholic schools from receiving any sort of public funding.


Wednesday, September 14, 2005
 
I'm Number One!

Or so a reader tells me that Google thinks I am. He entered "Clayton" in Google's new blogsearch tool, and my blog was the very first item it listed. Click here, and maybe I will still be at the top of the list!


 
Aurora Borealis Tonight?

There was a pretty big solar flare yesterday, and there is some possibility that we might see auroras a bit farther south than usual--perhaps even as far south as our property in Horseshoe Bend. While looking for aurora borealis forecasts, I found this utterly bizarre page:
How can we protect our homes, families and loved ones from an terrorism and war?
We will be spared from terrorism and war if we keep crucifixes on all our outside doors.
Jesus - "Pray and wear your sacramentals. And, also, My children, I ask you again to place a crucifix upon your door. Both front and back doors must have a crucifix. I say this to you because there will be carnage within your areas, and this will pass you by if you keep your crucifix upon your doors." (6-30-84)

Heaven’s Home Protection Packet...
Our Lord stated we must have crucifixes upon the outside of all of our outside doors. In the "Heaven’s Home Protection Packet" there are instructions, four crucifixes, and a tube of special cement for wooden or metal crucifixes. Wooden crucifixes adhere better to the doors when the aluminum strap is removed from the back. Put a light coat of cement on the back of the crucifix and then press it to the outside of the door. If you have any problems, you can call us at 616-698-6448 for assistance. This Heaven’s Home Protection Packet is available for a donation of $5.00 plus $3.00 shipping and handling. Send $8.00 to TLD Ministries, P.O. Box 40, Lowell, MI 49331. Item # P15 (Order Form)
You might almost get the impression that someone is more in the business of selling religious artifacts to the hopelessly gullible than spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.


 
On The Pledge of Allegiance Suit & Soap Opera

As you might expect, I'm pretty irritated by Michael Newdow's use of his daughter as a political football in his bizarre crusade to get the Pledge of Allegiance removed from California schools, and I'm not happy about how the Supreme Court keeps dodging these issues, rather than admit that...well, we'll get to what they are doing.

A federal judge has just granted Newdow's request for a restraining order against Elk Grove schools and the use of the Pledge. Since the Supreme Court dodged the question, the existing 9th Circuit precedent was still in effect, and the judge in this case did what he was supposed to do: follow precedent. I was pleased to see the judge's remarks about the Supreme Court's recent decisions that upheld the Ten Commandments at the Texas statehouse, but not in a courtroom:
This court would be less than candid if it did not acknowledge that it is relieved that, by virtue of the disposition above, it need not attempt to apply the Supreme Court’s recently articulated distinction between those governmental activities which endorse religion, and are thus prohibited, and those which acknowledge the Nation’s asserted religious heritage, and thus are permitted. As last terms cases, McCreary County v. ACLU, 125 S.Ct. 2722, 2005 WL 1498988 (2005) and Van Orden v. Perry, 125 S.Ct. 2854, 2005 WL 1500276 (2005) demonstrate, the distinction is utterly standardless, and ultimate resolution depends of the shifting, subjective sensibilities of any five members of the High Court, leaving those of us who work in the vineyard without guidance. Moreover, because the doctrine is inherently a boundaryless slippery slope, any conclusion might pass muster.
Exactly. The Supreme Court's decisions made no sense because they are trying to do something that makes no sense: pretend that the First Amendment requires the government to be completely neutral with respect to religion vs. non-religion--a position that would have astounded the First Congress, who passed the First Amendment.


 
Need Bigger Jaws

I discovered that it wasn't possible to turn 2.81" diameter plastic in my lathe. The standard 2.5" 3-jaw chuck is described as able to handle 2.25" stock. You can fit larger material into the chuck, but the jaws don't clamp it down very well. Unless you remove very, very small quantities of material, the torque pulls the stock right out of the jaws, and sends it flying across the garage in a quite energetic and noisy way. I learned to position my head somewhere out of the line of fire.

Sherline does sell a larger 3.1" 3-jaw chuck that will handle up to 2.75" stock, which I have ordered. I don't know that I will be turning the 2.81" material--this is for the leg inserts for the Losmandy HGM-150 mount--but I suspect that with a little care, the 3.1" chuck will handle it.


 
No Fat Left In Federal Budget!

Oh yeah, I really believe this!
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay said yesterday that Republicans have done so well in cutting spending that he declared an "ongoing victory," and said there is simply no fat left to cut in the federal budget.

Mr. DeLay was defending Republicans' choice to borrow money and add to this year's expected $331 billion deficit to pay for Hurricane Katrina relief. Some Republicans have said Congress should make cuts in other areas, but Mr. DeLay said that doesn't seem possible.

"My answer to those that want to offset the spending is sure, bring me the offsets, I'll be glad to do it. But nobody has been able to come up with any yet," the Texas Republican told reporters at his weekly briefing.

Asked if that meant the government was running at peak efficiency, Mr. DeLay said, "Yes, after 11 years of Republican majority we've pared it down pretty good."
I can believe that no members of Congress can bring him any examples of fat to cut--because one of the jobs of a Congresscritter is to, in the words of my former Misrepresentative, Lynne Woolsey (D-CA), "bring home the bacon." But I am shocked and dismayed that Rep. DeLay could make a statement like that without immediately dropping to the floor in laughter-induced convulsions.


 
More Evidence That Drunkenness Is A Bad Thing

It isn't just dangerous machinery that you shouldn't operate while drunk--it is also telephones:
An Illinois man made three mistakes earlier this month, according to the St. Clair County sheriff's office.

Mistake No. 1 was calling 911 about a robbery while drunk. Mistake No. 2 was telling deputies the purloined property happened to be several marijuana plants. Mistake No. 3 was not checking to make sure the plants were really gone in the first place.

Sheriff's Lt. Steve Johnson and Deputy Al Hake were dispatched to Anthony R. Martin's home outside Belleville on Sept. 2, reports the Belleville News-Democrat.

Martin, who admitted having had a few drinks, told the officers the dastardly woman who lived next door had stolen his pot plants, and then led the lawmen to where he said they used to be.

Sadly for him, the plants were, as Johnson put it, "still there, growing in the pots."
How drunk do you have to be before you forget that marijuana is still technically unlawful to grow?


 
An Ounce of Experience Beats a Pound of Theory

An interesting quote from an article about Wal-Mart's decision to stop selling guns temporarily in the areas affected by hurricane Katrina:
Smaller stores are eagerly filling the void. Spillway Sportsman, near Baton Rouge, sold 172 guns in one three-day period after the hurricane, when normally it might sell 15. One mother came in to buy her first gun after she and her two children, ages 9 and 12, witnessed a slaying on the streets of New Orleans, said Scott Roe, Spillway's owner.

''Her comment was, 'I was a card-carrying, antigun liberal -- not anymore,' " Roe said. ''She said, 'I'm going back home, and I am not going back unarmed.' "
There's a widespread belief that high violence rates promote support for gun control. This is actually not true; the high point in American opinion polls for a ban on handguns was 1959. People that do not perceive that they will personally need a gun for self-defense are generally more willing to go along with gun bans, and this is part of why Britons put up with the Firearms Act of 1920. When violence becomes sufficiently widespread and random that ordinary people think that they might need a gun to defend themselves, they are less willing to tolerate very restrictive gun bans.


Tuesday, September 13, 2005
 
Some Schools Have Problems With Gang Members Hanging Around Outside the Fence

But gang members are easy compared to what hazards are outside the fence at this school:
Audra Morrow, who grew up in Boulder and spent five glorious and quite cosmopolitan years living in San Diego, never imagined any of this. But here she is in the middle of the wild, rugged and stunningly remote Absaroka Mountains of northwestern Wyoming, flinging open the door of the tiny schoolhouse and leading the entire student body - this year it consists of four second-graders - out for recess.

She stands at the open door for a few moments, near the shelf containing three canisters of pepper spray, and she carefully scans the thickets of sage and pine that surround the old white school.

At the moment, there are no grizzly bears in the shrubs, and this is good.

Morrow relaxes and, with a cheerful "OK, go ahead!" she sends the kids scurrying out to play. She hopes that when a gigantic bear comes snorting and prowling around the school - and on a regular basis they do - the new, 8-foot high, heavy-gauge metal fence around the schoolyard will be sturdy enough to keep the beast out.

Back inside later on, she smiles and tells of the bear drill. It's a well-practiced procedure at this school and a few others in grizzly country.

"First," she says, "I yell 'Bear!"'

The moment the word leaves her lips, even though she was just explaining the drill to a visitor, two of her students spin around and look at her. Then their eyes dart to the window. And then, satisfied that this is not the actual thing, they resume coloring.

"After I yell," Morrow continues, "the kids know to stop whatever they're doing and walk, definitely not run, into formation. I stay between them and the bear, and they get into the school."

She laughs then, a nervous chuckle, at her own description of the bear drill.

"I guess I'd never thought too much about that part," she says. "The part where I stay between the kids and the bear."

Morrow lives with two loud dogs in a small cabin next to the schoolhouse. She never walks outside without one of the canisters of bear spray. Last school year, her first at the Wyoming Standard School, she and her students had 10 grizzly bear sightings.
It would appear that the Endangered Species Act has performed its intended function rather well.


 
Alcohol & Machinery Do Not Go Together

From the September 13, 2005 Detroit Free Press:
According to Troy Police Lt. Gerry Scherlinck, here's what happened:

After a loud noise jarred a Briarwood Drive resident awake about 2 a.m. Thursday, the 38-year-old looked outside to see that a Jeep Wrangler had crashed into his attached garage.

Then his doorbell started ringing incessantly. When he looked out the door, he didn't see anyone, so he stepped outside, armed with a handgun.

He found a man in the driver's seat of the Jeep trying to dislodge it from the garage door. With the pair yelling at each other, the driver backed out of the driveway and drove off, with the homeowner trying to get the license plate number.

As the homeowner walked back to his house, the Jeep driver came back down the street with the vehicle's lights off, circled several times around a traffic island at the end of the block, then drove up the man's driveway again.

The homeowner, who told police he was afraid the driver was trying to hit him, hid behind a vehicle parked in his driveway.

But the driver of the Jeep kept circling on his lawn and driveway, then accelerated and smashed into the parked vehicle twice.

At that point, the homeowner fired about four shots at the Jeep before the gun jammed. He ran to his house to get a second gun.

His wife, meanwhile, had called police, as had neighbors.

When the resident came back out of the house, the driver of the Jeep began accelerating directly at him. The homeowner fired two more shots at the Jeep. The driver then left the subdivision. Police did not release the homeowner's name or specify which block of Briarwood Drive he lives on.

Police caught up with Wooten driving a Jeep with bullet holes in it, near Square Lake and Dequindre roads.

Police said Wooten first told them that he had been shot at while trying to get into his own home in Sterling Heights. He later told police that he didn't remember anything from the night.

...

Police said Wooten was intoxicated but were waiting for results from a toxicology report to determine his blood-alcohol level. Scherlinck said a preliminary Breathalyzer test showed that Wooten had a level above 0.08%, the level at which a person can be convicted of drunken driving in Michigan.

According to police, Wooten had prior drunken-driving convictions.

Wooten was arraigned Friday in 52-4 District Court in Troy on charges of assault with intent to commit murder, assault with intent to do great bodily harm, felonious assault, malicious destruction of property greater than $1,000, unauthorized driving away of an automobile, operating while intoxicated -- third or subsequent offense -- and driving while license suspended.
He's lucky that he isn't stretched out on a morgue slab. Drunkenness: there's a reason that the Bible condemns it, repeatedly. It makes you do dumb things.


 
Successful Self-Defense; Still A Sad Result

Not every civilian use of a gun in a self-defense goes perfectly. Over at my Civilian Gun Self-Defense Blog, we show not just the perfect examples, but also the situations where the victim shoots the criminal--but still ends up hurt or dead. It isn't ideal, but the criminal who gets killed--even if he wounds or kills his victim anyway--is a criminal who won't repeat his crimes.

This is one of those cases where the victim didn't survive, but neither did the bad guy. At least the bad guy won't predate again:
Kimberly D. Boyd took her son to preschool Monday morning, then dropped by a bank before heading to her office in north Cobb County.

Minutes later, her routine was shattered, and sometime before 9:30 a.m. she was struggling for her life with a carjacker as her Toyota Sequoia raced south on U.S. 41. The kidnapping ended with the 30-year-old Acworth woman dead and the carjacker fatally shot by a passer-by.

Boyd died instantly when her SUV was broadsided by a cement truck, police said. Within seconds, the man driving Boyd's car was also dead — shot by Shawn Roberts, 31, who had seen Boyd fighting the man and followed the car, police said.

"She was fighting for her life," Roberts, who lives in Acworth, told WAGA-TV.

Roberts told police he was driving north on U.S. 41 about 9:30 a.m. when he saw a man beating a woman outside the SUV, just south of the Lake Allatoona bridge. He stopped and turned around on the four-lane road to help the woman, said Cobb Police Cpl. Dana Pierce.

The carjacker pushed the woman back into the SUV and took off, with the doors still open. Roberts followed about two miles to Lake Acworth Drive, where the crash occurred, Pierce said.

As Boyd's car turned east on Lake Acworth Drive it was struck by the cement truck.

Witness Bobby Williams said the truck had just started away from a traffic light and was traveling no more than 10 mph when it hit the SUV.

Williams, owner of A2Z Auto Service at 4356 North Cobb Parkway, said he saw Roberts get out of his 2004 black Dodge Ram pickup and run toward the accident scene wearing a leather shoulder holster.

"He looked official," Williams said, explaining that he thought Roberts might be a plain-clothes police officer. "He hollered at [the carjacker], 'Stay where you are. Stay where you are.'"

The carjacker ran toward a Raceway gas station on the corner and Roberts chased him. He told police the man turned a gun toward him, and he had to do something.

"I shot and killed a man today," Roberts told WAGA-TV. "I don't feel good about it, but if I hadn't have done something somebody else would have died."

Williams said he heard at least four, perhaps five, gunshots.

"He [the carjacker] was five feet in front of me when he got hit," Williams said. "On TV, all that flailing around that goes on is not what happened. He dropped like a sack of potatoes."

Monday night Cobb police identified the dead man as Brian Clark, 25, who has family in Acworth. Police did not say whether Clark lived in the area.
It appears that the carjacker was someone that needed to be removed from circulation, either through the legal system, or an incident like this:
Police also were investigating the possibility that the carjacker's gun had been taken in a robbery, rape and carjacking in Acworth last Tuesday, said Cobb robbery squad Lt. Tom Arnold.

"We're looking into that and whether the suspect in this assault is the same as in last week's attack in Acworth," Arnold said.

Acworth police spokesman Wayne Dennard said his department also is investigating the possibility that the man killed Monday morning was the suspect in a rape last Tuesday.

In last week's attack a woman was assaulted as she left home and was forced inside, where she was beaten and raped before being forced to drive to a nearby bank to get money from an ATM, Dennard said. The woman instead ran inside the bank and her assailant drove away in her car, which was later found abandoned, he said.


 
Avoidable Deaths in New Orleans

A few days ago, I had mentioned the deaths of more than 30 people at a nursing home near New Orleans after the staff ran away from rising waters--and left the patients behind. I don't know if this story is about the same event, but if so, it is worse than the earlier account:
The owners of a New Orleans-area nursing home where 34 patients died in Hurricane Katrina's floodwaters were charged with negligent homicide Tuesday.

The owners of St. Rita's Nursing Home in St. Bernard Parish "were asked if they wanted to move (the patients). They did not. They were warned repeatedly that this storm was coming. In effect, their inaction resulted in the deaths of these patients," Louisiana Attorney General Charles Foti said.
If this account is correct, it was not that they could not move the patients, but would not. If the facts are as stated, criminal charges seem completely appropriate. Why would you refuse to move patients? Were they afraid of losing revenue?


 
How Can We Blame Bush For This?

Somehow, I just know he's responsible!
PORTLAND, Oregon (Reuters) -- A large, slow-growing volcanic bulge in western Oregon is attracting the attention of seismologists who say that the rising ground could be the beginnings of a volcano or simply magma shifting underground.

Scientists said that the 100 square-mile bulge, first discovered by satellite, poses no immediate threat to nearby residents.

"It is perfectly safe for anyone over there," said Michael Lisowski, geophysicist at the United States Geological Survey's Cascades Volcano Observatory in Vancouver, Washington.

The bulge is rising at a rate of about 1.4 inches per year, according to a report issued by the U.S. Geological Survey.

The bulge is in a sparsely populated area 3 miles southwest of South Sister, a mountain 25 miles west of Bend, Oregon.


 
What Would Overturning Roe Do?

Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Professor Orin Kerr was making some interesting observations about Judge Roberts's responses to questions about his judicial philosophy--and of course, one of the hot button issues for members of the Senate Judiciary Committee is where Roberts stands on stare decisis, because the Democrats want him to commit that he won't overturn Roe v. Wade (1973).

Down in the comments section, a couple of people have expressed concern that if Chief Justice Roberts ends up as part of a future Supreme Court majority that overturns Roe, that it will make the Republicans a minority party again--presumably as enraged pro-choice voters re-register to express their disapproval of living in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaids' Tale.

How would overturning Roe change the abortion laws in the U.S.? I happen to think that part of the result in Roe (limited state authority to regulate first trimester abortions) can be reached by a proper application of original intent, since first trimester abortions were apparently lawful when the Ninth Amendment was ratified. You could make the argument that this was a right reserved to the people, since most states apparently did not prohibit first trimester abortions in 1791.

Overturning Roe would mean restoring authority to the states to regulate abortion. In practice, this would mean that the legislatures (presumably reflecting majority will in each state) would again be writing abortion laws, except for those states where the judiciary has found a right to abortion within the state constitution. If there is really a majority in most states in support of abortion, then why would overturning Roe change the status quo on abortion?

A slim majority of Americans support overturning Roe. There is a majority that reluctantly supports keeping abortion legal, at least in the first trimester (when it is just a blob, and doesn't have eyes, fingers, toes, etc.) but isn't keen on partial birth abortion, abortion without parental knowledge or consent, abortion for sex selection, or abortion on a whim. They want some substantial restrictions on abortion, but not necessarily a ban. I don't know that this majority is going to write terribly sensible abortion laws with such a contradictory set of concerns, but such a majority isn't going to be writing laws that ban all elective abortions, either.

Remember that before Roe, several states had already substantially liberalized their abortion laws (in California, after judicial action striking down an existing restrictive law). Even in states such as Oregon that had theoretically very restrictive abortion laws, abortion was actually quite common--with higher rates than some states had post-Roe.

Unless you think that there is an extraordinarily powerful pro-life movement--one that is either a majority of the voters, or such a powerful minority that it is going to walk all over the supposed pro-choice majority--overturning Roe is not going to dramatically change state laws on this subject.

Of course, if you think that abortion is going to suddenly become nearly unavailable in much of the United States because of overturning Roe, then you are taking the position that, in Ann Coulter's clever phrase,
Abortion – like other liberal priorities over the years including forced busing, gay marriage and removing "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance – is an issue liberals believe is best voted on by groups of nine or fewer.
If you want to argue that abortion is a fundamental human right, and not subject to abridgement by the majority, that's a plausible position, and worthy of legitimate debate. But don't then claim that support for unrestricted abortion is a majority position in the U.S.--but if Roe is overturned, those majorities are going to suddenly ban abortion.

Labels:



Monday, September 12, 2005
 
Do You Suppose This Will Bother The Left?

I frequently hear the claim that Palestinian objections to Israel are just disputes about land, not some sort of irrational hatred of Jews. But what shall we make of this?
GAZA CITY — Palestinians surged triumphantly into demolished Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip early today, torching empty synagogues and firing shots into the air, as the last Israeli soldiers withdrew after 38 years of occupation.

...

Celebrating Palestinians set fire to the synagogue in Netzarim, and there were reports of similar torchings in Morag and other locations.

Palestinian security forces appeared to have decided not to use force and instead let the celebrations play out, although it was unclear whether they could have held back the crowds if they had wanted to.
Can you imagine the upset if Israelis had torched mosques in the Occupied Terroritories? There is something unnerving about this--rather like Krystallnacht translated into Arabic. I can understand if the Palestinians decided to use the buildings for some other purpose, or simply demolished the buildings because the land was needed for a very different sort of structure--but burning them? Why?

Demolishing an operational building is a pretty crazy thing to do. A lot of material and labor went into making that building. If you wonder why the Arab world is so desperately poor, you don't have to look very hard to figure out why.


Sunday, September 11, 2005
 
House Project: Electrical, Green Submarine, & Master Bathroom

I went up Saturday morning to confirm the positions and numbers of outlets, switches, telephone, television, and Ethernet cabling. (Yeah, there are a couple of items where I can't use wireless, so I am making sure that there are CAT-5 cables from my office to my son's bedroom.)

I had mentioned previously that the LP gas tank, which looks like a green submarine, was now in the ground. Here's a picture.

Click here to enlarge

If a device travels underground, is it a submarine or a subterrane? If you bail out of a subterrane, do you worry about land sharks?

Here's the trench from the tank to the house, where the LP gas line feeds the kitchen, the water heater, and the outdoor barbecue spigot. I'm not quite sure where the backup generator will get its connection yet.

Click here to enlarge

Here's the master bathroom--in case you ever wondered what a bathroom looks like before it is fully dressed.

Click here to enlarge

If it looks a bit crowded--yeah, we may be overreacting to our current master bathroom, which is just wasting space. You spend all of about 30 minutes a day in there, at best. It doesn't have to be spacious.

Here you can see the east end of the house, where the exterior outlets are going to go, and the east hose bib. Our current house has two hose bibs, both set in very useless locations, so I was a bit specific about number and location.

Click here to enlarge

The weather has definitely changed here. I put on a jacket for a walk last night. It was positively brisk up at the new house Saturday morning--a welcome change after this long hot summer.

Last house project entry.

Labels:



 
An Interesting Gun Misfire

I've read of cases like this before--where the gun simply refuses to work, for no apparent reason. The woman in question was way down on her luck--perhaps why she was so willing to risk death:
She had been with friends that night at Mad Dog's Wisconsin Tap, 1918 N. Wisconsin Ave. At 1:45 a.m., she walked into the back lot, getting ready to leave and waiting for her pals.

A man rode up to her on a green bicycle. He pulled out a silver pistol and demanded, "Give me your money."

She was stunned, then furious. She thought to herself, "I have my last $10 in my pocket, and you're gonna take it? If I get killed, at least I won't have to worry about not having money anymore."

She said she had no money. The man repeated his demand. At that, she snapped.

She reared back and slugged him in the face. Recoiling, he rushed her and pinned her against the pub's outside wall.

He's not big, about 5 feet 7 inches and 130 pounds. But she's even smaller, by three inches and 10 pounds.

Still, she wrestled back, forcing both of them to the ground. The robber whacked her in the head with his gun, and he tried to get up to flee. But she reached up, grabbed him and pulled him back down.

As they scuffled, she shrieked for help. But he freed himself and got to his feet.

He raised the pistol and pointed the muzzle at her. Without a word, he pulled the trigger three times.

Click. Click. Click.

Three misfires. Three new leases on life.

Responding to her screams, her friends and a bartender rushed outside. The robber aimed the pistol their way.

The gun fired. But the bullet bounced in the dirt, inches from the bartender's foot.

...

Police have yet to catch the robber.

"I don't hate anybody," she says quietly. "I don't even hate the kid who did this to me."

In fact, she wonders if perhaps there was a purpose to the encounter - if not for her, for him. Perhaps he's thinking twice about sticking guns in people's faces.

"Maybe it's an intervention," she says. " ... maybe it's fate that he crossed paths with me."
I can see why she puts a divine intervention spin on it. Three times in a row, the gun fails to fire--when any shot would certainly have killed her. Then the gun starts working--and she's not at risk.

It makes you wonder, doesn't it?


 
Discovery Channel's "93: The Flight That Fought Back"

I watched it this evening. I do hope a lot of others were watching as well. There's a lot of leftists who are prepared to make all sorts of excuses for what al-Qaeda did: they were victims of the West; American culture is destroying indigenous societies by exporting McDonald's; Jews really run the world. It is good to reminded that the people that al-Qaeda killed on flight 93 were not neo-conservatives, "little Eichmanns," members of the international capitalist conspiracy, and many of them weren't even Jewish!

I was expecting a dramatic presentation, but it was a surprisingly effective mix of interviews with family members and friends, dramatic re-enactments, and actual video and audio from radio transmissions, phones, and surveillance cameras. In some places, the narrator (Kiefer Sutherland) was careful to tell us that we don't know exactly what happened, but this is one possible reconstruction, based on the cockpit voice recorder, and what loved ones tell us was consistent with the personalities of those involved.

My wife chose not to watch it; she thought it would be too painful. She was probably right. I found myself in tears in places. These were ordinary people put into extraordinary circumstances, and they responded in an extraordinary way. They sacrificed their lives (which they suspected were probably already lost) to make sure that flight 93 wasn't used as a missle. Brave men and women should not be forgotten.


 
Almost Human; Lathe Work

I still have a bit of a sore throat, but I'm feeling almost human now.

I had mentioned a few days ago an "Aha!" moment about how to machine one of these parts. I spent the weekend on this, and discovered that there were only two problems when I tried to use that technique:

1. Relieving the holder for the 3/8"-16 bolt head wasn't necessary, because the bolt head fits into the three jaw chuck's through headstock hole just fine. Not only was it not necessary, but relieving it made it easier for repeated clamping of the jaws to chew up the surface of the holder. Leaving it solid prevents it from deforming.

2. It isn't really practical (at least with the Sherline) to put a tap into the tailstock chuck and tap a hole in the workpiece under power--it would just bore a hole. Tapping a hole by hand, or with the tap in an electric drill, wasn't accurate enough. I would end up with a workpiece that, once screwed on the holder, wasn't turning exactly aligned with the headstock. The solution was to put the tap in the tailstock chuck, and then turn the headstock by hand, while rotating the tailstock advance at about the same rate.

I can now make what I consider a perfectly acceptable ScopeRoller Quick Release Toe Saver body all by myself! I shipped one to Britain and one to Spain on Saturday as part of other ScopeRoller orders!